Week 5 Practice Worksheet PSY/315 Version 6

University of Phoenix Material

 

Week 5 Practice Worksheet

Officials and managers

Professionals

Technicians

Sales workers

Office and clerical

Craft workers

Operatives

Laborers

Service workers

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

Job Description Sections
Job Competencies

  • Common Names
  • Job competencies
  • Knowledge, skill, ability, and other characteristics (KSAOs)
  • Job specifications
  • Competencies should be separated
  • Those needed before hire
  • Those that can be learned after hire

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

Is competency modeling really different from KSAOs?

Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Battista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., Kehoe, J., Pearlman, K., Prien, E. P., & Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The practice of competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 703-740.

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

Critiquing Job Descriptions
Exercise 2.1

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

  • The verbs at the beginning of the sentences are not parallel (e.g., takes v. inspect)
  • Under food preparation, “Handle problems” is too vague
  • Under cleaning, “RK-9” and “10-6” are jargon and wouldn’t make sense to a person unfamiliar with the job
  • Under tools, a cash register is listed yet there are no tasks reported that involve a cash register
  • Under job context, lifting 80-pound crates is mentioned. There are no tasks involving lifting crates.
  • Personal Requirements
  • “Be flexible” is vague. Are we talking about physical flexibility or interpersonal flexibility?
  • “No mental or physical problems” is a violation of the ADA.
  • Counting back change is listed but there are no tasks listed that involve counting back change.

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

Writing a Job Description
Exercise 2.2

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

Preparing for a Job Analysis
Who Will Conduct the Job Analysis?

  • Internal Department
  • Human resources
  • Compensation
  • Training
  • Engineering
  • Internal task force
  • Supervisors
  • Employees
  • Consultants
  • Interns/class projects

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

Preparing for a Job Analysis
Which Employees Should Participate?

  • Choices
  • All employees
  • Random sample
  • Representative sample
  • Convenience sample
  • Potential Differences
  • Job competence
  • Race
  • Gender
  • Education level
  • Viewpoint

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

Preparing for a Job Analysis
What Type of Information Should be Gathered?

  • Types of Requirements
  • Formal
  • Informal
  • Level of Specificity
  • Job Loan officer
  • Position Loan officer at the Boone branch
  • Duty Approval of loans
  • Task Investigates loan history to determine if applicant has bad credit
  • Activity Runs credit histories on credit machine
  • Element Enters applicant’s SSN into credit machine
  • Sub element Elevates finger 30 degrees before striking key

© 2016 Cengage Learning

*

Conducting a Job Analysis
Basic Steps

  • Step 1: Identify tasks performed
  • Step 2: Write task statements
  • Step 3: Rate task statements
  • Step 4: Determine essential KSAOs
  • Step 5: Select tests to tap KSAOs

© 2016 Cengage Learning

 

Chapter 13

 

1.   Your research team has been tasked with finding the correlation of the following scenario:

 

Four research participants take a test of manual dexterity (high scores mean better dexterity) and an anxiety test (high scores mean more anxiety). The scores are as follows:

 

Person                          Dexterity                       Anxiety

 

1                                  1                                  10

2                                  1                                    8

3                                  2                                    4

4                                  4                                  -2

 

Describe the process that your research team would go through by completing the following:

 

  1. Make a scatter diagram of the scores. Should be negative direction
  2. Describe in words the general pattern of correlation, if any.
  3. Figure the correlation coefficient.
  4. Explain the logic of what you have done, writing as if you are speaking to someone who has never heard of correlation (but who does understand the mean, standard deviation, Z scores, and hypothesis testing).
  5. Give three logically possible directions of causality, indicating for each direction whether it is a reasonable explanation for the correlation in light of the variables involved (and why).