Walden NURS6550 Week 2 Hernandez Family Assessment

Walden NURS6550 Week 2 Hernandez Family Assessment

walden NURS6550 Week 2 Hernandez Family Assessment – 00604580

Hernandez Family Assessment

Assessment is as essential to family therapy as it is to individual therapy. Although families often present with one person identified as the “problem,” the assessment process will help you better understand family roles and determine whether the identified problem client is in fact the root of the family’s issues. As you examine the Hernandez Family: Sessions 1-6videos in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat the client family. Walden NURS6550 Week 2 Hernandez Family Assessment

Learning Objectives

Students will:

Assess client families presenting for psychotherapy

ORDER NOW FOR A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

To prepare:

Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide on family assessment.
View the Hernandez Family: Sessions 1-6 videos, and consider how you might assess the family in the case study.
Note: For guidance on writing a comprehensive client assessment, refer to pages 137–142 of Wheeler (2014) in this week’s Learning Resources.

The Assignment

Address in a comprehensive client assessment of the Hernandez family the following:

Demographic information
Presenting problem
History or present illness
Past psychiatric history
Medical history
Substance use history
Developmental history
Family psychiatric history
Psychosocial history
History of abuse and/or trauma
Review of systems
Physical assessment
Mental status exam
Differential diagnosis
Case formulation
Treatment plan

Note:Any item you are unable to address from the video should be marked “needs to be added to” as you would in an actual comprehensive client assessment

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

Hernandez Family Assessment Sample Paper

Name

Institution

Course Instructor Date

Introduction

Hernandez family presents with health patterns that are critical to the assessment of the models related to healthcare provision. This family health assessment presents an overall evaluation of the family’s health situation as the subject of the examination.

Demographic Information

Hernandez family is a conventional family comprising 27-year old father Juan Hernandez, 25-year old mother Elena Hernandez and their two male children namely Juan Jr.(8) and Alberto(6). The family currently resides in Queens, New York. While Juan works in the airport baggage section, Elena is a babysitter for a family residing in their neighborhood. Due to financial constraints, Juan has to work overtime to bridge the family’s financial shortfalls.

Presenting complaint

Both parents referred to Administration of Child Services for the manner in which they punish their children which the social worker believes is too harsh.

History of Presenting Illness

The family was well until one of the sons Juan Jr. reported to a staff within school that his parents make him kneel and hold out his hands holding encyclopedias in each as punishment. A social worker was then called in to intervene and her assessment was that the parents’ method of punishing their two children was too harsh. This and the involvement of the Administration of Child Services mandated the parents to attend parenting classes or else have their children taken away from them. The parents however do not find their means harsh and feel the intervention is unnecessary given the fact that they too were raised in similar ways by their own parents. Walden NURS6550 Week 2 Hernandez Family Assessment

Past Psychiatric History

None of the parents point towards a history of psychiatric illness amongst them or within the family although both admit to being severely punished as children. More needs to be added

Medical History

There is no history of past admissions. No history of past acute or chronic illnesses. More information is needed

History of Substance Use

The Hernandez family feels strongly and advocates against issues surrounding substance abuse. The family has no history of abusing or using substance. However, both Elena and Juan often drink socially with family and friends, with Juan sometimes going out with friends on weekends in order to blow off steam, having beers.

Developmental History

The parents indicate their children achieved their developmental milestones as expected.

They too report no delays in their developmental milestones.

Family Psychiatric History

They report no psychiatric illnesses within the family. More information is needed

Psychosocial History

The marriage union of the couple is heterosexual. Finances seem to be a huge struggle for the family and Juan has got to work extra hours in order to be able to provide fully for his family. More information is needed.

History of trauma or abuse

Juan reports receiving severe punishment from his father whenever he did wrong while still young. He’d be ordered to go get encyclopedias and hold them up with both hands outstretched as punishment. He reports having the sensation that his hands would fall off. His mother administered similar punishment to him and reports it would be more severe by having to hold up more books. Elena admits to having similar severe punishments when she was still a child with Juan holding the belief, he must have got it from them. However, they both deny receiving or meting out any physical abuse.

Review of Systems

Respiratory-

No wheezing, no chest pains, no coughing, no hemoptysis, no paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea

Cardiovascular-

No Palpitations, No Orthopnea, No Chest Pain, No Dyspnea on Exertion, No paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, No shortness of breath, No Claudication, No Edema,

Gastrointestinal-

No Pain, No Nausea, No Flatulence, No Diarrhea, No Melena, No Constipation, No Heartburn, No Dysphagia, No Anorexia, No Hematochezia, No Jaundice, No Vomiting

Genitourinary system –

No Hesitancy, No Dysmenorrhea, No Hematuria, No Dysuria, No Urinary Flow Changes, No Urinary Frequency, No Urinary Incontinence, No Flank Pain, No Urgency, No dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Central nervous system-

No Paresthesia, No Weakness, No Syncope, No Numbness, No Headache, No Dizziness, No Loss of Consciousness.

Musculoskeletal system-

 No Neck Pain, no positive Injury History, No Joint Swelling, No Joint Stiffness, No Arthralgia, No Myalgia, No Back Pain,.

Summary

These are Juan and Elena Hernandez 27 and 25 year old respectively. A couple from Queens, New York who presented with complaints of allegedly administering too harsh punishments to their sons Juan Jr. (8) and Alberto (6). There exists no past history of psychiatric illness, child abuse or neglect.

Mental Status Examination

The clients are two young looking male and female clients seated looking well groomed and appropriate for age. Both are co-operative and willingly engage in conversation. Their speech is of normal rate and rhythm, coherent and audible. They exhibit an anxious mood but with appropriate affect. Both are well oriented to time place and person displaying intact short- and long-term memory. They display good abstraction with intact insight and judgement Differential Diagnosis

Axis I – Clinical Diagnoses – Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Axis II – Personality Disorders and mental retardation – NIL

 

Axis III – Any General Medical Conditions – NIL

 

Axis IV – Psychosocial and Environmental problems – Financial hardships According to APA 2013, exposure of an individual to an intense or prolonged psychological stressor qualifies as being diagnosed with PTSD. The scenario above depicts a couple that have had rough and severe punishments meted out to them in their childhood. Juan at one point infers “I think I inherited it from my parents”. This alludes to the fact that he feels that perhaps his high handedness may be as a result of his childhood experiences. The fact that the family struggles to make ends meet especially financially with Juan having to work overtime  to raise enough money for his family points to an added social stressor that might also be negatively impacting on the parents and by extension the children. The abuse can arise as result of parents disciplining their children with uptight anger and stress which lead to abuse (Coleman, 2018).

Treatment Plan

Family Group Therapy

CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)

Family Group Therapy entails a structured therapy that is tailored to minimize or decrease family conflict while galvanizing around family strengths (McLendon & Petr, 2005). This approach is essential in ensuring that a family unit minimizes on actions that may lead to strife among members and ensure that they support and coalesce around that which is god. CBT on the other hand encourages taking responsibility for actions and acknowledging there will be consequences for the same.

Conclusion

This family assessment was done on the Hernandez family and focused on various elements of assessment including the family’s demographic information, physical assessment, psychosocial issues, medical history, potential substance use, developmental history, trauma and abuse, mental health, differential diagnosis, as well as treatment planning alongside other aspects of assessment. Based on the findings of this assessment, it is clear that the family presents with health patterns that are critical to the assessment of the models linked healthcare provision. Walden NURS6550 Week 2 Hernandez Family Assessment

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Coleman, P. (2018). What is the Difference Between Discipline and Abuse? It’s all about what transpires in the moment. Retrieved from https://www.fatherly.com/parenting/what-is- the-difference-between-discipline-and-abuse/

Mclendon, D., Mclendon, T., & Petr, C. G. (2005). Family-Directed Structural Therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(4), 327-339. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01574.x

Excellent (90-100) Good (80-89) Fair (70-79) Poor (0-69)
Quality of Work Submitted:The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
(0%) – 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.
(5%) – 5 (5%)
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
(0%) – 3 (3%)
No purpose statement was provided.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.
(9%) – 10 (10%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to support point of view.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
(0%) – 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.
(0%) – 13 (13%)
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
(8%) – 8 (8%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
(0%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
(7%) – 7 (7%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
(0%) – 4 (4%)
Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.