SOC 305 Week 2 DQ -Legal Representation and Social Class

SOC 305 Week 2 DQ -Legal Representation and Social Class

SOC305 SOC/305 SOC 305 Week 2 Discussion/DQ examining the Legal Representation and Social Class -Ashford University

After listening to the interview with Stephen B. Bright, The quality of a legal defense: Does it matter if you’re rich or poor?, and studying the required readings for the week, please respond to the following:

• What role does geographic location play in the quality of representation provided by the public defender?
• How does the overburdened public defense system contribute to issues of wrongful conviction?
• Contrast the legal representation described by Bright to the level of representation available to white-collar, corporate, and environmental crimes.
• Considering the war on drugs, discuss what role the war on drugs might play in contributing to an overburdened public defense system?
• What relationship exists between race, the war on drugs, and the overburdened public defender system?
• How can we solve the problems of an overburdened public defense system and racial discrimination in the criminal justice system?

Your initial post should be at least 350 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and at least one other scholarly resource. Please properly cite in the body of your work and at the end of your work your required references. Please read several of your classmates initial posts and respond to at least two of your classmates posts by Day 7. Your peer responses should focus on the course concepts and be scholarly in nature. Be sure to support any opinions you have with credible, scientific evidence.

Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Participation

Read all of your fellow students postings and respond to at least two of your classmates posts. All responses should be respectful but critical in scholarly thinking. Responses should be between 100-150 words. Responses must begin by naming the individual to whose post you are responding along with one sentence that summarizes his or her point. This way, a person reading your post will understand to whom you are responding.