PSY655 Wk3 Complete Discussions

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 3 Discussion 1

Discuss what can be drawn from the suggested findings of Brain and Lewis in the assigned article, “Exploring Leadership Preferences in Multicultural Workgroups: An Australian Case Study,” regarding the impact of education levels on leadership preferences in settings outside Australia?

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 3 Discussion 2

How might the findings in the assigned article, “Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis,” influence the way you would coach a group of developing male and female leaders?

PSY655 Wk3 Complete Discussions

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 3 Assignment

Details:

Design a PowerPoint focusing on working class women and corporate women in film/television, the public sphere, and/or popular culture. Explore gender and culture—the intersection of race and class and the impact on women’s leadership style and/or ability.

To complete this PSY655 Wk3 Complete Discussions assignment, consider the following examples:

Corporate/Professional Women (film/popular culture)
Corporate Women (CEOs): Lynn Elsenhans, Carol Meyrowitz, Andrea Jung, Ellen Hullman, Ilene Gordon, Patrica Woertz, Carly Fiorina, etc.
Professional Women: Elizabeth Warren, Helen Gurly Brown, Gloria Steinem, Oprah Winfrey, Katie Couric, Barbara Walters, Connie Chung, Maria Shriver, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, etc.
Professional Women (television characters/actresses): Jennifer Fischer (The Office), Glenn Close (Damages), Kyra Sedgwick (The Closer), Chandra Wilson (Grey’s Anatomy), and Tina Fey (30 Rock), etc.
Corporate/Professional Women in film: The Stepford Wives, The Devil Wears Prada, Mildred Pierce, Working Girl, Nine to Five,etc.
Working Class Women (film/popular culture) Bread and Roses, Country, Norma Rae, Silkwood, Steel Magnolias, Working Girl, North Country, Salt of the Earth, Fast Food Women, My American Girls, Her Own Words
Women in Nontraditional Jobs: Roseanne, etc.
Female Politicos/Public Office: Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Michelle Obama, Sarah Palin, Mary L. Landrieu, Margaret Thatcher, Mary Robinson, Indira Gandhi, Eleanor Roosevelt, Golda Mier.

ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER WITH ALL INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOWED

To frame the assignment context, consider a fundamental tenet of Women’s Studies and the Women’s Movement: the “personal is the political,” whereby the intersection of public issues (public sphere) and personal problems (private sphere) yields political action or movement. Address the following:

Depict how women in film/television, the public sphere, and/or popular culture portray leadership and or management skills.
What characteristics, behaviors, and/or traits do the characters exhibit that demonstrate their leadership or management skills?
Is there a “politics to language” with respect to communication and leadership style/ability?
Is there a (dis)connect with respect to age and leadership style/ability? If so, provide examples.
What effect does “labeling” have on leadership and women’s ascension (or lack thereof) to power?

Use the GCU eLibrary databases; include a minimum of three outside references or other resources for evidentiary support.

While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This PSY655 Wk3 Complete Discussions assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

PSY 655 Week 4 Discussions and Assignments

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 4 Discussion 1

Choose one definition of workplace stress and discuss it in relation to one of your own workplace experiences. How does the definition you chose fit within the framework of the example you describe?

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 4 Discussion 2

Consider the two paradigms (individual and organizational) with respect to managing workplace stress. Find and discuss at least one “research-based” article supporting either the individual or the organizational workplace stress management approach.

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 4 Assignment

Details:

Write a 1,000-1,250-word essay analyzing the following:

What are some of the measured and unmeasured costs of workplace stress?
What are some of the more common individual actions recommended to reduce workplace stress?

Seek out at least three individuals within your sphere of influence and ask the following:

What does workplace stress feel like to you?
Identify any activities or actions employed to reduce workplace stress.
What are some of the more common individual actions recommended to reduce workplace stress?

Seek out at least three individuals within your sphere of influence and ask the following:

What does workplace stress feel like to you?
Identify any activities or actions.

Use the GCU eLibrary databases; include a minimum of three outside references or other resources for evidentiary support.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This PSY 655 Week 4 Discussions and Assignments uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

PSY 655 Week 5 Discussions and Assignment Essays

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 5 Discussion 1

Considering the Workplace Stress assignment from Module 4, how might work-related stress contribute to the discussion of red flags in the assigned article, “Why Good Leaders Make Bad Decisions”?

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 5 Discussion 2

What are some potential issues of self-interest that might distort decision making?

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 5 Assignment

Details:

Create a scenario (1,250–1,500 words) that requires and results in a quality decision. Consider the following:

Provide specific details as to whether collaboration is merited.
Is collaboration the best way to achieve a positive outcome? Why/Why not?
What strategic approach would you take to ensure a quality decision is made?

Use the GCU eLibrary databases; include a minimum of three outside references or other resources for evidentiary support.

Prepare this PSY 655 Week 5 Discussions and Assignment Essays assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 5 Discussion 2

What are some potential issues of self-interest that might distort decision making?

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 6 Discussion 1

A solid definition of the Law of Unintended Consequences is provided on page 54 of the assigned article, “The Unintended Consequences of the Application of Technology in Teaching and Learning Environments,” which includes work from Portes (2000). Draw a comparison between Portes notion of the importance of careful and sustained analysis of the social context and the red flags of poor decisions.

PSY 655 Grand Canyon Week 6 Discussion 2

Consider the bicycle helmet example of Blanch flower in the assigned article, “The Law of Unintended Consequences.” Clearly more detailed research would be required to support his notion, but he poses an interesting way of considering unintended consequences. Consult your own experiences and those in your immediate circle of influence to generate one potential example of unintended consequences.

GC PSY655 Week 6 Assignment

Details:

Write an essay (1,250 – 1,500 words) analyzing the unintended consequence(s) of a decision.

To frame the context for this assignment, consider the following questions: Leadership is hard; why? Perhaps the culprit is the tangential difference (disconnect?) between the intellectual, emotional, and inspirational decision relative to the problem. How do effective leaders reconcile the art and the science of decision making with the possibility of unintended consequence?

Select a case study on a business, social, or psychological “problem” in which a decision yielded an unintended consequence. Describe the process of decision making that was used in this instance and why that process led to the decision that was made.

Consider the following areas of concentration for effective decision making:

1. Barriers.
2. Cost of indecisiveness.
3. Collaboration: strength and or weaknesses.
4. Unintended consequence: Inherited feature in the decision-making process?
5. Recommendations or reconciliations to avoid unintended consequences.

Example topics include, but not limited to:

Unintended Consequence: Business

1. Athlete-Agent
2. HMO Cost Containment
3. Financial Crisis
4. Bailout of Financial Auto Industry
5. Corporate Governance Reform and CEO Compensation
6. Economic Restructuring in Iraq

Unintended Consequence: Social

1. Communism for Neighborhood Relations
2. Civil Rights Act of 1964
3. Cuban Missile Crisis
4. Employer Layoffs
5. End-of-Life Care
6. Health Care Reform
7. Immigration Act of 1965
8. Large-Scale Iron Ocean Fertilization
9. Rise of International Criminal Law
10. Transportation Security (TSA) Administration Policies
11. Youth Bike Helmet Laws

Unintended Consequence: Psychological

1. Gender Aspects of Conflict Interventions (Bosnia, Somalia, etc.)
2. Women in the Workforce
3. The Workforce Investment Act

Use the GCU eLibrary databases; include a minimum of three outside references or other resources for evidentiary support.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

ORDER HERE FOR CUSTOM PSY 655 ESSAY SOLUTIONS

GC PSY655 Week 7 Assignment

Details:

This CIT Interview Techniques assignment includes two parts: a critical incident interview (due in Module 7), and a summary report (due in Module 8).

To frame the context for this assignment, consider the following statement as the basis of the project: “There is evidence that researchers using the CIT are now asking participants to reflect upon and write down the meaning of critical incidents, not just discuss them in a research interview” (From the Canadian Journal of Counselling, by Butterfield et al., 2005, p. 489).

Interview Preliminaries:

1. Using methodology described in the readings, prepare a list of questions regarding an individual’s direct personal experience with leaders. A minimum of 15 questions is required.
2. As the interviewer, pose the questions to the respondent(s). Questions include but are not limited to specific leadership moments, negative and/or positive experiences, leader decisions and consequences, or any direction drawn from course readings to this point.
3. Identify a subgroup of people in your immediate circle of contact with whom you have the ability to conduct a critical incident technique (CIT) interview regarding their experience with leaders in their own lives.
4. Conduct a minimum of three interviews.

Prepare this assignment as a Word document according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

GC PSY655 Week 8 Assignment

Details:

As the second part of the CIT Interview Techniques assignment, write a summary report (1,250-1,500 words) about the information gleaned from the interview process in Module 7.

Interview Preliminaries Redux:

1. Select two to three people to whom you will administer the interview developed in Module 7.
2. Administer interview questions to chosen participants for final formal interview purposes.
3. Revise your original questions. Administer the additional final set of questions regarding why the selected incidents might be important (i.e., have the participants identify the meaning of the incidents discussed during the interview process).
4. Provide follow-up questions as necessary along with subsequent responses.

Interview Summary Report

1. Write a summary report (1,250-1,500 words) about the information gleaned from the interview process.
2. Conclude paper with a discussion of the participants’ descriptions of the meaning of the incidents described during the interview process.

Use the GCU eLibrary databases; include a minimum of three outside references or other resources for evidentiary support.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

PSY655 Wk3 Complete Discussions