NURS 8410 Week 11: EBP Dissemination – Part I

NURS 8410 Week 11: EBP Dissemination – Part I

NURS 8410 Week 11: EBP Dissemination – Part I

One of the chief purposes of translating evidence into practice is to advance the field of nursing. Dissemination is a critical step in this process.

It is important to disseminate and share the information gained from a translation-of-evidence project to enhance the body of knowledge within the profession, thus furthering the science of nursing. Yet how does one prepare to disseminate research findings?  What is required to engage in this form of scholarship?

This week, you assess the role of dissemination in scholarship. You also complete your practicum experience and submit your time log and final journal entry.

Learning Objectives for NURS 8410 Week 11: EBP Dissemination – Part I

Students will:

  • Analyze the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship
  • Assess the practicum experience

Photo Credit: [Blend_ImagesCLOSE]/[Blend Images]/Getty Images

Learning Resources

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S. & Terhan, M.F. (2016). Translation of evidence into nursing and health care practice (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Springer NURS 8410 – Best Practices In Nursing Specialties weekly discussion essay assignments. NURS 8410 Week 11: EBP Dissemination – Part I

  • Chapter 18, Dissemination of Evidence

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (1999). Defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/defining-scholarship

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2006). The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/DNPEssentials.pdf

 

Boyer, E. L. (1992). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Issues in Accounting Education, 7(1), 87-91.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Carina, K., Chan, Y., Oldenburg, B., & Kasisomayajula, V. (2015). Advancing the science of dissemination and implementation in behavioral medicine: Evidence and progress. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 277-282 doi 10.1007/s12529-015-9490-2

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Glassick, C. E. (2000). Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Academic Medicine, 75(9), 877-880. Retrieved from http://www.academicpeds.org/events/assets/Glassick article.pdf

 

Lane, J.P. & Stone, V.J. (2015). Comparing three knowledge communication strategies – diffusion, dissemination and translation – through randomized controlled studies. Assistive Technology doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-566-1-92

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Leeman, J., Myers, A.E.,Ribisl, K.M.,& Ammerman, A.S. (2015). Disseminating policy and environmental change interventions: Insights from obesity prevention and tobacco control. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22:301–311 doi 10.1007/s12529-014-9427-1

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Rieger, K. & Schultz, A.S. (2014). Exploring arts-based knowledge translation: Sharing research findings through performing the patterns, rehearsing the results, staging the synthesis. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(2), 133–139.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Tricco, a.C., Ashoor, H.M., Cardoso, R., MacDonald, H., Cogo, E., Kastner, M., Perrier, L., McKibbon, A., Grimshaw, J.M. & Straus, S.E. (2016). Sustainability of knowledge translation interventions in healthcare decision making: a scoping review. Implementation Science, 11(55) doi 10.1186/s13012-016-0421-7

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. NURS 8410 Week 11: EBP Dissemination – Part I

Discussion: Defining Scholarship

A hallmark of your education at Walden University is your development as a scholar-practitioner. As a doctoral student, you have been actively engaged in scholarly activities that support your growth as a scholar-practitioner. As you continue to develop, implement, and evaluate your EBP project, you will be applying scholarship as you translate research into practice. A key element of scholarship is dissemination.

As you prepare for this Discussion, consider the role of evaluation and dissemination in scholarship. If research is not disseminated, can it be considered scholarship?

To prepare:

  • Reflect on the definitions and criteria for scholarship presented in the Learning Resources.
  • Consider AACN’s definition of scholarship and their vision of the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in furthering nursing scholarship.

By Day 3

Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

  • What is the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship? Provide at least two specific examples.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6

Respond to two of your colleagues in your small group in one or more of the following ways:

  • Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.
  • Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
  • Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom and/or from your own research in the Walden Library.
  • Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
  • Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
  • Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you learned and/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments made by your colleagues.

Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and any additional sources.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 11 Discussion Rubric

 

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 11 Discussion Assignment: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP Project

Disseminating EBP Projects

Many factors influence how successfully an EBP Project is implemented and evaluated. As noted in this week’s Learning Resources, using a translation framework can facilitate effective implementation and the evaluation of outcomes.
For this assignment you will prepare a scholarly product that reports the results and implications of your project to designed audience.  The scholarly product for dissemination reports the results and implications of your project to a specified audience. Your scholarly product may be in the form of a project summary and evaluation report, poster presentation, program evaluation report, or a media or technology-based deliverable.

To prepare for this week’s section of Application 5:

  • Reflect on the definitions and criteria for scholarship presented in the Learning Resources and in your weekly discussions.
  • Consider AACN’s definition of scholarship and their vision of the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in furthering nursing scholarship.

The full Application 5 is due by Day 7 of this week. Instructions for how to prepare for previous sections of this Application have been provided in Weeks 9 and 10. NURS 8410 Week 11: EBP Dissemination – Part I

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOMIZED ACADEMIC PAPER

To complete:

Assignment 5: Disseminating the EBP Project

For this assignment you will prepare a scholarly product that reports the results and implications of your project to designed audience.  The scholarly product for dissemination reports the results and implications of your project to a specified audience. NURS 8410 – Best Practices In Nursing Speciality – Weekly Discussion Essays. Your scholarly product may be in the form of a project summary and evaluation report,  poster presentation, program evaluation report, or a media or technology-based deliverable, Your scholarly product must include the following:

  • Background, Purpose, and Nature of the Project (2 points) 
    Describe the larger problem or issue you explored in your DNP Project. Identify your practice-focused question. Explain how this problem or issue affects nursing practice and the overall health care system, and describe how your DNP Project explored possible strategies for addressing the problem or issue.
  • Evidence (2 points)

Identify the practice setting and context in which you conducted your project, a summary of the evidence supporting the project, and the process for implementation and evaluation.

  • Presentation of Results (2 points)

Explain the results of your DNP Project and recommendations for change that you made to the organization.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment  You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submitbutton to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 11 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 11 Assignment  – Practicum: Journal and Time Log

By Day 7

You will submit a journal entry (along with your time log) for Weeks 8-11. Journal entries need to connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. Your journal entry should be week-based and sequential so that all journal entries are contained in one file.

  • Describe the observed activity
  • Using an evidence-based approach, analyze the problem, issue, or situation. Address questions posed in the weekly practicum pages if appropriate.
  • Reveal how the real-world might mirror or diverge from program-related evidence, concepts, and/or theories.
  • Time Log submission

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Practicum for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Practicum+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 11 Practicum 
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer Find the document you saved as “WK11Practicum+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submitbutton to complete your submission.

To access your rubric:

Week 11 Practicum Rubric

Check Your Practicum Draft for Authenticity

To check your Practicum draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 11 Practicum draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Practicum by Day 7

To submit your Practicum:

Week 11 Practicum – Week in Review

In this final week you analyzed the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship and assessed the practicum experience.

Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this week, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.Â