NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment: Creating a Flowchart

NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment: Creating a Flowchart

NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment: Creating a Flowchart

Workflow analysis aims to determine workflow patterns that maximize the effective use of resources and minimize activities that do not add value. There are a variety of tools that can be used to analyze the workflow of processes and clarify potential avenues for eliminating waste. Flowcharts are a basic and commonly used workflow analysis method that can help highlight areas in need of streamlining.

In this Assignment, you select a common event that occurs regularly in your organization and create a flowchart representing the workflow. You analyze the process you have diagrammed and propose changes for improvement. NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment: Creating a Flowchart

To prepare NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment: Creating a Flowchart:

Identify a common, simple event that frequently occurs in your organization that you would like to evaluate.

Consider how you would design a flowchart to represent the current workflow.

Consider what metrics you would use to determine the effectiveness of the current workflow and identify areas of waste.

To complete NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment: Creating a Flowchart:

Write a 3- to 5-page paper which includes the following:

Create a simple flowchart of the activity you selected. (Review the Sample Workflow of Answering a Telephone in an Office document found in this week’s Learning Resources for an example.).

Next, in your paper:

Explain the process you have diagrammed.

For each step or decision point in the process, identify the following:

Who does this step? (It can be several people.)

What technology is used?

What policies and rules are involved in determining how, when, why, or where the step is executed?

What information is needed for the execution of this step?

Describe the metric that is currently used to measure the soundness of the workflow. Is it effective?

Describe any areas where improvements could occur and propose changes that could bring about these improvements in the workflow.

Summarize why it is important to be aware of the flow of an activity.

Remember to include a cover page, introduction, and summary for your paper. NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment: Creating a Flowchart.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Week 11 Assignment: Health Information Patient Handout

One of the pivotal goals of consumer health literacy efforts is to design educational materials that attract as well as educate users. In this Assignment, you design a health information document on a topic that is of interest to you.

Also Read:

NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion: HITECH Legislation Essay

Nurs 6051 Weeks 1-11 Discussion – Transforming Nursing And Healthcare Essays

Nurs 6051 Week 11 Assignment: Health Information Patient Handout

To prepare:

Select a health issue of interest to you.

Identify the audience or population that you seek to educate about this issue.

Search the Internet to find credible sites containing information about your selected topic.

Review the two health literacy websites listed in this week’s Learning Resources. Focus on strategies for presenting information.

To complete:

Design an educational handout on the health issue you selected.

Include a cover page.

Include an introduction that provides:

An explanation of your issue and why you selected it

A description of the audience you are addressing

In the handout itself:

Develop your handout in such a way that it attracts the attention of the intended audience.

Include a description of the health issue and additional content that will enhance your message (i.e., key terms and definitions, graphics, illustrations, etc.).

Recommend four or five sites that provide clear, valuable, and reliable information on the topic.

Note: Remember to keep the information in your health handout and its design at the appropriate level for the audience you are seeking to inform. Submit your Assignment as a Word document.

By Day 5

Submit the Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.

If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.

Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. NURS 6051 Discussion Papers – Transforming Nursing & Healthcare Through IT.

Rubric Detail

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.	Points:Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)No purpose statement was provided. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.	Points:Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.	Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.	Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Feedback:
Written Expression and FormattingParagraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:
Written Expression and FormattingThe paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (? 5) APA format errors. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Related Posts:

Walden NURS 6051 Week 2 Informatics Assignment

NURS 6051 Discussion: Healthcare Information Technology Trends

nurs 6051 literature review assignment

NURS 6051 Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies