NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER Assignment

A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile

Walden University: Nursing 6051, Section 9

A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile

Clostridium difficile<span class=”s5″> has been found to be the main cause of gastrointestinal-related death …

Health Literacy Promotion Among Patients. NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER Assignment

The attached brochure was created for the sake of increasing health literacy and …

Conclusion

Since C. diff has the potential to kill or significantly disturb the health of patients, it is ...

CLICK HERE TO ORDER CUSTOM NURS 6051 PAPERS

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS_5051_Week4_ Application_ Rubric

Grid View

List View

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.	Points:Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)No purpose statement was provided. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.	Points:Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.	Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view. Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER Assignment	Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.	Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Feedback:
Written Expression and FormattingParagraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback:
Written Expression and FormattingEnglish writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation NURS 6051 Week 4 Discussion – Innovative Technology	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:
Written Expression and FormattingThe paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (? 5) APA format errors. Feedback:

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

Points:Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Feedback:

Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.

Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)No purpose statement was provided.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

Points:Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.

Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER Assignment

Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

Feedback:

Written Expression and FormattingParagraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.

Feedback:

Written Expression and FormattingEnglish writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

NURS 6051 Week 4 Discussion – Innovative Technology

Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Written Expression and FormattingThe paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (? 5) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion – Impact of HITECH on My Organization

NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

NURS 6051 Week 7 Discussion – Three Workflow Concepts

NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER Assignment

NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER Assignment

CLICK HERE TO ORDER CUSTOM NURS 6051 PAPERS

NRS 410 CLC Assignment: CHF Exacerbation and Increased Dyspnea

NRS 410: Patient with Cardiomyopathy and Congestive Heart Failure

NRS 410: Anemia Case Study Essay Assignment

NRS 410: Approach to Care of Cancer Assignment

Week 4: Cardiovascular System, Part 1