Contact us:
+1 (520) 226-8615
Email:
[email protected]
NUR 590 Topic 2 Assignment
NUR 590 Topic 2 Assignment
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
CLICK HERE TO ORDER NUR 590 Topic 2 Assignment
In order to formulate your evidence-based practice (EBP), you need to assess your organization. In this assignment, you will be responsible for setting the stage for EBP. This assignment is conducted in two parts: an organizational cultural and readiness assessment and the proposal/problem statement and literature review, which you completed in NUR-550.
NUR 590 Topic 2 Assignment Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
It is essential to understand the culture of the organization in order to begin assessing its readiness for EBP implementation. Select an appropriate organizational culture survey tool and use this instrument to assess the organization’s readiness.
- Develop an analysis of 250 words from the results of the survey, addressing your organization’s readiness level, possible project barriers and facilitators, and how to integrate clinical inquiry, providing strategies that strengthen the organization’s weaker areas.
- Make sure to include the rationale for the survey category scores that were significantly high and low, incorporating details or examples. Explain how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization.
- Submit a summary of your results. The actual survey results do not need to be included.
Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review
In NUR-550, you developed a PICOT statement and literature review for a population quality initiative. In 500-750 words, include the following:
- Refine your PICOT into a proposal or problem statement.
- Provide a summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations.
General Guidelines:
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Note: After submitting the assignment, you will receive feedback from the instructor. Use this feedback to make revisions for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
Topic 2 DQ 1
Do you foresee any issues with implementation of your project? Identify stakeholders who could assist in supporting you, and any theoretical frameworks (organizational change, leadership, role-specific) or models that could help you adapt.
Topic 2 DQ 2
What strategies will you use in your new practice as an advance registered nurse to review and critique literature pertinent to your practice?
Week 2 Participation
Start Date
Aug 19, 2021 12:00 AM
Due Date
Aug 25, 2021 11:59 PM
Points
20
Status
Upcoming
Assessment Description
There is no description for this assessment.
Resources
Collapse All
Supporting the Uptake of Nursing Guidelines: What You Really Need to Know to Move Nursing Guidelines Into Practice
Read “Supporting the Uptake of Nursing Guidelines: What You Really Need to Know to Move Nursing Guidelines Into Practice,” by Mat
… Read More
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare : A Guide to Best Practice
Read Chapters 15 and 18 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.
View Resource
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Explore the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) website.
Aligning Organizational Culture and Infrastructure to Support Evidence-Based Practice
Read “Aligning Organizational Culture and Infrastructure to Support Evidence-Based Practice,” by Ost, Blalock, Fagan, Sweeney, an
… Read More
JBI EBP Resources
Use the JBI EBP Resources to search for EBP resources related to your project.
Organizational Readiness Tools for Global Health Intervention: A Review
Read “Organizational Readiness Tools for Global Health Intervention: A Review,” by Dearing, from Frontiers in Public Health</
… Read More
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840160/
The Checklist: Recognize Limits, but Harness Its Power
Read “The Checklist: Recognize Limits, but Harness Its Power,” by Grif Alspach, from Critical Care Nurse (2017).
Cochrane Library
Explore the Cochrane Library website.
http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/view/0/index.html
A Multisite Health System Survey to Assess Organizational Context to Support Evidence-Based Nursing
Read “A Multisite Health System Survey to Assess Organizational Context to Support Evidence-Based Nursing,” by Pitmann et al., fr
… Read More
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Read Chapters 23 and 24 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
View Resource
Readiness Assessment
Read “Readiness Assessment” (2015), located on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) website.
https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/readiness/index.html
Cultivate a Culture of Excellence at the Point of Care
Read “Cultivate a Culture of Excellence at the Point of Care,” by Medeiros, from Nursing Management (2020).
The Cochrane Collaboration
Explore the Cochrane Collaboration website.
6 Steps for Transforming Organizational EBP Culture
Read “6 Steps for Transforming Organizational EBP Culture,” by Ogiehor-Enoma, Taqueban, and Anosike, from Nursing Management<
… Read More
Rubric Detail NUR 590
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| NUR-590 | NUR-590-O101 | Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment and Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review | 80.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) | Satisfactory (88.00%) | Good (92.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 70.0% | ||||||||
| Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment | 40.0% | A discussion of the readiness level or the organization, possible project barriers and facilitators, how to integrate clinical inquiry, and the rationale for survey categories is not included. | A discussion of the readiness level or the organization, possible project barriers and facilitators, how to integrate clinical inquiry, and the rationale for survey categories is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A discussion of the readiness level or the organization, possible project barriers and facilitators, how to integrate clinical inquiry, and the rationale for survey categories is present. | A discussion of the readiness level or the organization, possible project barriers and facilitators, how to integrate clinical inquiry, and the rationale for survey categories is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive discussion of the readiness level or the organization, possible project barriers and facilitators, how to integrate clinical inquiry, and the rationale for survey categories is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Section B: Proposal or Problem Statement | 10.0% | A proposal or problem statement is not included. | A proposal or problem statement is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A proposal or problem statement is present. | A proposal or problem statement is clearly provided and well developed. | A proposal or problem statement is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| NUR 590 Topic 2 Assignment | |||||||||
| Section B: Literature Review | 15.0% | A summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations, is not included. | A summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations, is present. | A summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations, is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |||
| Required Sources | 5.0% | Sources are not included. | Number of required sources is only partially met. | Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. | Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | |||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | ||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
| NUR 590 Topic 2 Assignment | |||||||||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Format | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
| NUR 590 Topic 2 Assignment | |||||||||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
