Contact us:
+1 (520) 226-8615
Email:
[email protected]
NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
This week you have learned about common respiratory disorders in Adult and Geriatric patients. For this discussion, select one of the following respiratory disorders and provide the following in your initial post:
Paul Ehrlich first named a bilobed nucleated cell as an âeosinâ-âophilâ in 1879 based on the cell’s granular uptake of eosin [1,2], which binds to cationic proteins present in specific granules. Eosinophils represent approximately 1% of peripheral blood leukocytes, and their differentiation and activation are mainly regulated by interleukin-5 [3].
One of their characteristics is the capacity to adhere to activated blood endothelial cells, leave the bloodstream to migrate into inflamed tissues, and concentrate at the site of certain types of inflammation [4â6] and tumors [7].
These cells were soon found in airway tissue and sputum of patients with asthma [8?]. Over the years, eosinophils were identified as a prominent cell type in certain forms of asthma [8?] and eosinophilic vasculitis [4,9].
Asthma is a chronic airway disease characterized by inflammatory, functional, and structural changes responsible for variable bronchial hyperresponsiveness and reversible expiratory airway limitation [10]. Airway inflammation is central to disease pathophysiology by releasing several proinflammatory mediators and remodeling the airway wall [11].
Varying combinations of these complex processes explain the different asthma phenotypes [10]. Most asthmas are associated with T helper type 2 (Th2) cell-dependent production of IgE and recruitment of eosinophils, mast cells, and basophils [11].
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) (formerly ChurgâStrauss syndrome) is a systemic small-vessel vasculitis associated with asthma and eosinophilia [9]. EGPA commonly presents with an upper airway tract and lung involvement associated with persistent eosinophilia and upregulation of interleukin-5.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), an inflammatory disease distinct from asthma, develops later in life in smokers and is characterized by progressive, irreversible airflow obstruction where a key role is played by CD8 T cells and neutrophils [12]. Acute exacerbations of COPD are usually associated with neutrophils but can also present airway [13], sputum [14], or blood eosinophilia [15].
The review examines recent advances in the unique biology of the eosinophil, how dysregulated eosinophil functions promote different respiratory disorders, and how targeting the interleukin-5 pathway might offer clinical benefit to some patients with asthma, EGPA, and COPD.
Human eosinophils are equipped with a large number of cell-surface receptors [16?,17,18] (Fig. ?(Fig.1).1). Human eosinophils can be distinguished from other granulocytes by certain surface receptors selectively expressed on eosinophils [interleukin-5R?, CC-chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3), cysteinyl leukotriene type 1, ?4?1 and ?4?7 integrins].
The epidermal growth factor-like module containing mucin-like hormone receptor 1 (EMR1) appears truly eosinophil specific [17,20]. A variety of inhibitory receptors that regulate eosinophil survival and activation have also been described including Siglec-8, CD300a, killer activating receptors, potassium inwardly rectifying channel, and Fc?RIIb [19].
Eosinophils contain intracellularly the ? splice variant of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR-A) in high copy number [21]. The proapoptotic GR-A isoform is five-fold higher in eosinophils than in neutrophils making eosinophils highly susceptible (and the neutrophil much less) to therapeutic effects of glucocorticoids, such as apoptosis [22]. NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
Eosinophil specific granules contain four cationic proteins, major basic proteins (MBP), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), and eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) which exhibit cytotoxic activity and can cause significant tissue damage [23].
Lipid mediators produced by eosinophils include leukotriene C4 (LTC4), platelet-activating factor (PAF), thromboxane B2 (TxB2), prostaglandin (PG)E1, and PGE2. Human eosinophils are a major source of a wide spectrum of cytokines, including interleukin-5, interleukin-4, interleukin-13, TGF?, and IFN? [24â27] (Fig. ?(Fig.2).2). They also produce a wide spectrum of immunologically active factors, including chemokines [28,29].
Thus, it is likely to predict that eosinophils are equipped to perform different functions such as tissue repair and remodeling, angiogenesis [30], clearance of parasites [31], metabolic homeostasis [32], and immune cell activation [16?,33]. During their transit in the bloodstream and at sites of inflammatory/immune reactions, eosinophils interact with and modulate the functions of several cells of the innate and adaptive immune system [16?,34,35] (Fig. ?(Fig.33).
Eosinophils and their mediators participate in the pathophysiology of a variety of diseases, including allergic asthma [10,36?], EGPA [4,9], and cancer rejection [7]. However, current data suggest that deficiency of eosinophils in animals and humans appears to have no ill effects on normal health [37].
Interleukin-5 is a cytokine that belongs to the ? common chain family [together with interleukin-3 and granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)] and binds an heterodimer receptor composed by the specific subunit interleukin-5R? and common ? subunit ?c [3,38] (Fig. ?(Fig.4).4).
Interleukin-5 plays a fundamental role in eosinophil differentiation in the bone marrow, recruitment and activation at sites of allergic inflammation [3]. Human eosinophils express about a three-fold higher level of interleukin-5R? compared with basophils [39]. Th2 cells, mast cells, CD34+Â progenitor cells, invariant natural killer T, group 2 innate lymphoid cells, and eosinophils themselves are major cellular source of interleukin-5 [40â42].
Group 2 ILCs are an important source of interleukin-5 contributing to tissue and blood eosinophilia [43]. Interestingly, blood eosinophils demonstrate circadian cycling and group 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophil number through the production of interleukin-5 [42]. Interleukin-5 modulates the differentiation and maturation of eosinophil in the bone marrow, their migration from blood to tissue sites [44], and the prevention of eosinophil apoptosis [45].
Interleukin-5 also appears to modulate the development and functions of human basophils and mast cells. Interleukin-5 enhances the release of mediators from human basophils [46] via the engagement of IL-5 receptor [42].
There is increasing evidence that eosinophilic inflammation of the lungs is a hallmark of eosinophilic asthma and has been associated with elevated levels of interleukin-5 in bronchial biopsies from asthmatic patients [47]. Moreover, interleukin-5 mRNA is upregulated in the bronchial mucosa upon allergen challenge [48] and interleukin-5 concentrations correlate with clinical features of asthma [49].
Eosinophils play a critical role in the pathogenesis and severity of asthma through the action of interleukin-5. In the asthmatic lung, T lymphocytes and group 2 ILCs are main sources of interleukin-5 with eosinophils and mast cells contributing to the level of this cytokine [43,50]. Interleukin-25 stimulates Th2 cells and group 2 ILCs to increase the production of interleukin-5 [41,43] markedly.
The precise role of eosinophils as a prominent cell type in certain phenotypes of asthma was not firmly established until a number of clinical trials demonstrated that treatment with monoclonal antibodies against interleukin-5 significantly reduced the number of lung and blood eosinophils in patients with severe corticosteroid-resistant asthma [51??,52â55,56??,57]. Trials of therapeutics involving monoclonal antibodies to interleukin-5 and its receptor, interleukin-5R?, and other approaches have been completed or are underway in patients with bronchial asthma, EGPA, and COPD.
Targeting interleukin-5 or interleukin-5R? is an appealing approach to the treatment of patients with eosinophilic asthma. Anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibodies bind to interleukin-5 interfering with its ligation to interleukin-5-R? expressed on the eosinophil and basophil membranes [3] (Fig. ?(Fig.4).4). Two different humanized anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibodies, mepolizumab (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK) and reslizumab (Teva Pharmaceuticals, Petha Tiqwa, Israel), have been developed and shown safety and efficacy in clinical trials for asthma.
Mepolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) of the IgG1/k class which has been investigated for the treatment of asthma, atopic dermatitis, hypereosinophilic syndrome, eosinophilic esophagitis, nasal polyposis, and EGPA [51??,53,55,56??,57â59]. Table ?Table11 summarizes the clinical trials evaluating the effects of mepolizumab in asthma [51??,53,55,56??,57,58,60]. An initial study [58] on the safety and efficacy of mepolizumab (750?mg intravenously (i.v.) every 4 weeks for 3 months) in 11 patients with mild asthma showed that the antibody was well tolerated and induced a decrease of blood eosinophils, but did not deplete airway or bone marrow eosinophils. The authors found no difference between mepolizumab and placebo on peak expiratory flow rate, airway hyperresponsiveness, or forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) in these patients with mild asthma. A subsequent larger study [53] in patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma confirmed that mepolizumab (750?mg i.v. every 4 weeks for 1 year) reduced blood and sputum eosinophils. This treatment reduced the number of severe exacerbations during the treatment and improved the quality of life score [Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)]. Also in this study, mepolizumab did not influence FEV1 and bronchial hyperreactivity. In a similar study [55] performed on a limited number of nine patients with prednisone-dependent asthma, mepolizumab (750?mg i.v. every 4 weeks for 5 months) had similar effects on blood and sputum eosinophils and reduced exacerbations. This study showed that mepolizumab allowed prednisone sparing in patients who had asthma with sputum eosinophilia. In the largest study ever undertaken (462 patients) in severe eosinophilic asthma, mepolizumab (75, 250, or 750?mg i.v. every 4 weeks for 13 infusions) reduced blood and sputum eosinophilia and exacerbations. Also in this study [57], FEV1, AQLQ, and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores were not modified by mepolizumab treatment.
First author/ref/year | Disease severity | No. of patients treated | Dosage/delivery | Outcome summary |
Flood-Page et al. [58], 2003 | Mild asthma | 11 | 750?mg i.v. every 4 weeks for 3 months | ?Blood Eos; ?Airway Eos only by 50%?=?PEF, FEV1, bronchial hyperresponsiveness |
Haldar et al. [53], 2009 | Eosinophilic asthma | 61 | 750?mg i.v. every 4 weeks for 1 year | ?Blood?+?Sputum Eos; ?Severe exacerbations; ?QoL?=?FEVj, bronchial hyperreactivity |
Nair et al. [55], 2009 | Prednisone-dependent asthma | 9 | 750?mg i.v. every 4 weeks for 5 months | ?Blood?+?Sputum Eos; ?Exacerbations; Prednisone sparing effect |
Pavord et al. [57], 2012 | Severe eosinophilic asthma | 462 | 75â250â750?mg i.v. every 4 weeks for 13 infusions | ?Blood?+?Sputum Eos; ?Exacerbations?=?FEV1, AQLQ, and ACQ scores |
Bel et al. [51??], 2014 | Severe eosinophilic asthma | 135 | 100?mg s.c. every week for 20 weeks | Glucocorticoid sparing effect; ?Exacerbations; Improvement ACQ-5 score |
Ortega et al. [56??], 2014 | Severe eosinophilic asthma | 385 | 75?mg i.v. or 100?mg s.c. every 4 weeks for 32 weeks | ?Blood?+?Sputum Eos; ?Exacerbations; ?FEV1; ?ACQ-5 score |
Basu et al. [60], 2015 | Severe eosinophilic asthma | Healthcare resources and costs of mepolizumab versus placebo in a clinical trial (MENSA Study) |
Two recent studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab administered subcutaneously (s.c.). In 135 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, mepolizumab (100?mg?s.c. every 4 weeks for 20 weeks) had a glucocorticoid-sparing effect and reduced exacerbations. The authors also reported a significant improvement in the ACQ-5 score [51??].
In another study [56??] in which 385 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma were treated with mepolizumab (75?mg i.v. or 100?mg?s.c. every 4 weeks for 32 weeks), this treatment reduced blood eosinophils, the number of exacerbations, improved FEV1Â and ACQ-5 score. The latter study has been subjected to additional analysis showing that mepolizumab treatment significantly reduced the cost of the treatment of these patients [60].
An open-label study evaluating the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mepolizumab administered s.c. in children from 6 to 11 years of age with severe eosinophilic asthma is underway (NCT02377427). First, on November 2015 the US FDA and, then, on December 2, 2015 the European EMA approved mepolizumab as an add-on maintenance treatment for adults with severe eosinophilic asthma. NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
Reslizumab (formerly SCH55700, Cinquil; Teva Pharmaceuticals) is a humanized anti-interleukin-5 mAb of the IgG4/k class in clinical development for the treatment of eosinophilic inflammatory disorders. Reslizumab has been evaluated in randomized controlled clinical trials in patients with asthma [52,54] (Table ?(Table2)2) and nasal polyps [61].
In 18 patients with severe asthma reslizumab (0.03â1?mg/kg i.v. in single dose) was safe and decreased blood eosinophils for at least 4 weeks [62]. In a more recent study [52], reslizumab administered in 53 adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (3?mg/kg i.v. every 4 weeks for 12 weeks) reduced blood and sputum eosinophils, improved airway function (FEV1), and increased ACQ score.
The biological and clinical improvement was more marked in patients with nasal polyps that represented approximately 30% of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. These findings have prompted multifaceted asthma studies that are currently underway. The US FDA Advisory Committee approved reslizumab on 11 December 2015 as an add-on maintenance treatment for adults with severe eosinophilic asthma.
First author/ref/year | Disease severity | No. of patients treated | Dosage/delivery | Outcome summary |
Kips et al. [54], 2003 | Severe asthmatics | 18 | 0.03â1?mg/kg i.v. single dose | Safe; ?Blood Eos |
Castro et al. [52], 2011 | Severe eosinophilic asthma | 53 | 3?mg/kg i.v. every 4 weeks for 12 weeks | ?Blood Eos; ?FEV1; ?ACQ-5 score; Particularly in patients with nasal polyps ¹30% patients had nasal polyps |
Benralizumab (formerly MEDI-563; MedImmune-AstraZeneca, London, UK) is a humanized mAb of the IgG1/k class that binds to human interleukin-5R?, resulting in inhibition of interleukin-5 receptor activation. Benralizumab is not fucosylated and this enhances its binding to Fc?RIIIa, leading to enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [3] (Fig. ?(Fig.4).4).
Benralizumab binds with high affinity to the D1 domain of interleukin-5R? on human eosinophils and basophils. Interestingly, human eosinophils express about a three-fold higher levels of interleukin-R? compared with basophils [39]. In the latter study, it has been demonstrated that benralizumab induces eosinophil and basophil apoptosis mediated by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity.
Table ?Table33 summarizes the clinical trials evaluating the effects of benralizumab in asthma [63,64??,65,66]. The first study in 44 adult patients with mild atopic asthma a single dose of i.v. benralizumab (0.03â3â?mg/kg) reduced blood eosinophils. Eosinopenia lasted 8â12 weeks.
Benralizumab was associated with a transient, mild decrease of white blood cells and increased C-reactive protein (Âą 5.5-fold), interleukin-6 and creatine phosphokinase of peripheral muscular origin [63]. In another study of 26 adult patients with eosinophilic asthma, single-dose i.v. (1?mg/kg) and 3 s.c. doses (1?mg or 200?mg every month for 3 months) reduced eosinophil counts in blood sputum and airway mucosa/submucosa. Interestingly, the number of basophils, which expressed interleukin-5R? [39], also markedly decreased [65]. NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
First author/ref/year | Disease severity | No. of patients treated | Dosage/delivery | Outcome summary |
Busse et al. [63], 2010 | Mild atopic asthma | 44 | 0.0003â3?mg/kg i.v. single dose | ?Blood Eos at dose 0.03â3?mg; Eosinopenia lasted 8â12 weeks |
?Transient, mild decrease in WBC | ||||
?CRP increased Âą5.5-fold | ||||
?Interleukin-6 increased | ||||
?CPK of peripheral muscular origin increased | ||||
Laviolette et al. [65], 2013 | Eosinophilic asthma | 26 | 1?mg/kg i.v.; 100?mg s.c. every month for 3 doses; 200?mg s.c. every month for 3 doses | ?Eos in blood, sputum and bronchial mucosa; ?Basophils; Nasopharingitis 25%; Headache 25%; Nausea 22% |
Castro et al. [64??], 2014 | Eosinophilic asthma | 384 | 2â20â200?mg 2 s.c. every 4 weeks for the first 3 doses, then every 8 weeks for 1 year | 20?mg and 100?mg? asthma; Exacerbation?=?FEV1? |
Nowak et al. [66], 2015 | Asthma after acute attack | 72 | Single dose 0.3?mg/kg i.v. 1?mg/kg i.v. Evaluated up to 6 months | ?Blood Eos; ?Exacerbations |
A phase 2b study administered bevacizumab to 385 adult patients with eosinophilic, uncontrolled asthma. In asthmatics receiving bevacizumab (20 and 100?mg two s.c. injections every 4 weeks for a total of 12 months) there were fewer exacerbations. The higher 100?mg dose of benralizumab also improved lung function, asthma control, and mean ACQ-6 score compared with placebo [64??].
This study has provided useful information to design phase 3 studies underway in patients with moderate or severe asthma with peripheral eosinophil count of at least 300?cells/?l. In a recent study [66], a single dose of benralizumab (0.3 and 1?mg/kg i.v.) was administered to 72 adult patients with severe asthma resulting in emergency department visit with the assumption that these patients are at increased risk for exacerbations. A single dose of benralizumab reduced blood eosinophils and the exacerbations during the following 3 months.NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
Antisense oligonucleotides can be used as a therapeutic strategy to down-regulate the transcription of specific proteins [67]. TPI ASM8 (Topigen Pharmaceuticals, Montreal, Canada) is a mixture of two modified phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides, one directed against the human ?c chain shared by the interleukin-3, interleukin-5, and GM-CSF receptors, and the other directed against the chemokine receptor CCR3 present on human eosinophils, basophils [68], and mast cells [69].
With this broad spectrum of activity, it was hoped that TPI ASM8 may provide more complete inhibition of eosinophilic influx than agents targeting interleukin-5 alone. Inhalation of TPI ASM8 reduced eosinophils in sputum and attenuated the allergen-induced airway responses in subjects with mild asthma [70]. A subsequent study evaluated the dose-response effects of TPI ASM8 in mild asthmatics.
It found that TPI ASM8 was safe and well tolerated at all doses and inhibited eosinophil influx in sputum and ECP after allergen challenge. Moreover, the oligonucleotides attenuated early and late responses to allergen and improved airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine [71].
In another study [72], TPI ASM8 reduced allergen-induced sputum eosinophils, the early and late asthmatics responses and the number of eosinophil progenitors CD34+Â interleukin-5?R+ in mild asthmatics. Although therapy with this novel multitarget approach appears safe and promising, TPI ASM8 seems to have been discontinued. NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
In 1951, J. Churg and L. Strauss [73] first described a form of systemic vasculitis occurring exclusively among patients with asthma and intense tissue eosinophils. This condition, called âChurgâStrauss syndromeâ for many years, has now been recognized as EGPA [9].
EGPA commonly presents with upper airway tract and lung involvement, cardiac and skin lesions. Although the pathogenesis of EGPA is multifactorial, the disease has a genetic background and can presumably be triggered by exposure to allergens or drugs [9].
The asthmatic and eosinophilic components suggest an activated Th2 imbalance [74]. Interleukin-5 appears to be upregulated in active EGPA [74]. Eosinophils are increased both in peripheral blood and tissue lesions. Eotaxin-3, produced by epithelial and endothelial cells, might contribute to tissue influx of eosinophils [75]. Activated eosinophils release cationic proteins, thereby contributing to tissue damage. Moreover, eosinophils in EGPA produce interleukin-25, which induces Th2 responses, thereby maintaining a vicious circle [76].
There is no consensus regarding the use of remission induction and remission maintenance therapeutic approach in patients with different forms of EGPA. Asthma is a well established and prominent clinical hallmark of EGPA. In a series of 383 patients, about 90% had asthma at EGPA diagnosis, with a mean onset of asthma to EGPA onset interval of 9 years [77].
In a series of 22 patients, the majority had severe or moderate asthma onset, and the condition was poorly controlled in 95% [78]. Cardiac involvement occurs in the majority of EGPA cases [77] and represents the major cause of early death and poor long-term prognosis. Eosinophil cationic proteins can activate human cardiac mast cells to induce the release of fibrogenic and vasoactive mediators [34,79].
A pilot study [80] tested the safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in seven steroid-dependent EGPA patients unable to taper prednisone below 10?mg daily. The patients received 4 monthly infusions of mepolizumab (750?mg each) on top of their therapy.
Most patients were able to taper their prednisone dose, achieved a better control of the disease and a reduction in peripheral eosinophil count. Interestingly, the lack of improvement in pulmonary function despite reduced peripheral blood eosinophil count suggests that other variables contribute to EGPA airway disease. Finally, relapses were the rule following treatment discontinuation.
Another pilot study [81] in refractory/relapsing EGPA patients confirmed the glucocorticoid-sparing property of mepolizumab in a series of eight out 10 patients. These results suggest that adjunct therapy with mepolizumab might be a glucocorticoid-sparing treatment option in patients with EGPA and reiterates the role of eosinophil in this eosinophilic vasculitis. Several double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials are underway (NCT00716651 and NCT02020889).
COPD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, primarily caused by tobacco smoking and indoor/outdoor pollution. It is characterized by irreversible, progressive airflow obstruction [82]. Chronic inflammation in the airways is mainly caused by CD8+Â T cells, macrophages, and neutrophils [12].
Approximately 20% of patients with COPD without asthma or atopy have persistent circulating and airway eosinophilia associated with an increased risk of exacerbations [14,83]. Importantly, asthma attacks with eosinophils predict mortality in COPD patients [15]. Inhaled glucocorticoids are the key drug to prevent exacerbations in severe COPD where eosinophilia is present [12].
Although asthma and COPD in their typical forms are distinct clinical entities, some patients have features of both diseases. Their condition is now called asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) [84,85]. ACOS is still poorly understood and presumably includes several phenotypes necessitating different treatments [86,87].
A phase 2 trial tested the safety and efficacy of benralizumab in eosinophilic COPD (sputum eosinophils >3%) [88?]. In patients with COPD benralizumab did not reduce the exacerbations and did not modify lung function. However, it was noticed a trend toward an improvement in FEV1Â and exacerbations in patients with a baseline blood eosinophils greater than 200?cells/?l and treated with benralizumab. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of interleukin-5-targeted therapy in different forms of COPD, including ACOS.NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
In several studies the administration of mepolizumab has been found to be well tolerated in adult patients with eosinophilic asthma [51??,53,55,56??,57] and EGPA [81,89] for periods of 3 months to approximately 1 year. Recent evidence demonstrates that eosinophils play a major role in cancer rejection [7] and several hematologic and tissue cancers can be associated with eosinophilia [90]. Moreover, it has been suggested that âtargeted antieosinophilic strategies may unmask or even accelerate progressionâ of certain tumors in few patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome [91]. Therefore, long-term studies should evaluate the safety of targeted antieosinophilic strategies.
The success of novel biological agents in general, and in particular for interleukin-5 pathway inhibition, in asthma largely depends on the ability to select the appropriate patients. Ideally, patients should be selected by an easily measurable biomarker. The blood and/or sputum eosinophil count appears to be closely associated with a clinical response to interleukin-5 pathway inhibition in adult patients with eosinophilic asthma [51??,55,56??,57]. It is unclear whether eosinophilia is a useful biomarker to predict the efficacy of interleukin-5R targeting in patients with eosinophilic COPD.
Other biomarkers in asthma might include activated eosinophil surface phenotype as detected by flow cytometry [92], elevated levels of blood and/or sputum interleukin-5 [93], soluble interleukin-5R? [94], EMR1 [21], and soluble Siglec-8 [95]. We want to suggest that combining multiple biomarkers might be a better strategy to select asthmatic, COPD and ACOS patients responsive to interleukin-5 pathway inhibitors. The use of multiple inflammatory biomarkers has already been shown to improve the prediction of risk for cardiovascular disease [96]. NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
It has been suggested that using supervised cluster analysis can help to select specific patients characteristics and therapeutic response to mepolizumab [97?]. It is likely that in the future, biologic samples (e.g. blood cells, tissue biopsy, or sputum) from patients with eosinophilic respiratory disorders will be analyzed (e.g. biomarkers, transcriptomes, genes, microRNA, and others) for the purpose of phenotyping patients to tailor their treatment.
Severe eosinophilic asthma can occur in children [36?]. Pharmacologic and biologic treatment of different forms of asthma can differ in children when compared with adults also because of distinct pathogenetic mechanisms [36?], comorbidities (e.g. cardiovascular involvement) and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics [98]. An open-label study is underway to characterize the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of mepolizumab administered s.c. in children from 6 to 11 years of age with severe eosinophilic asthma (NCT02377427). This study will also provide information whether eosinophilia is a useful biomarker to predict the efficacy of interleukin-5 targeting in children with eosinophilic asthma.
Omalizumab is approved in the treatment of adults and adolescents with severe asthma. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of omalizumab versus interleukin-5 pathway inhibitors in the treatment of adults and adolescents with severe asthma is needed in populations eligible to both the biologics.
Benralizumab binds with high affinity to the D1 domain of interleukin-5R? present on both human eosinophils and basophils. Although eosinophils express about three-fold higher level of interleukin-5R? compared with basophils, bevacizumab induces apoptosis of both eosinophils and basophils) [39].
Thus, the possibility exists that bevacizumab might have a more articulated effect than the monoclonal antibodies anti-interleukin-5. In addition, given the relevance of basophils and their mediators (e.g. interleukin-4, interleukin-3, leukotrienes, VEGFs, and others) in the pathogenesis of allergic disorders [99â101] it is possible that some of the clinical benefits of benralizumab in asthma might be because of its modulatory effect on these cells. NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
Asthma and COPD are distinct chronic inflammatory respiratory disease characterized by some similarities and many striking pathophysiological differences [84â86]. A total of 20â30% of patients with COPD without history of asthma have blood and tissue eosinophilia associated with increased risk of exacerbations [13,15,83]. In a phase 2 clinical trial, benralizumab did not reduce the exacerbation rate in eosinophilic COPD [88?]. Further studies should focus on selected populations of COPD, including ACOS.
Asthma is a prominent feature of EGPA and there is no consensus on the use of remission induction and remission maintenance of EGPA. Preliminary evidence suggested that mepolizumab is safe in patients with EGPA enabling glucocorticoid tapering without modifying lung function [89]. Interestingly, in a pilot study [102] we have found that omalizumab has a glucocorticoid-sparing effect while decreasing blood eosinophils and improving lung function in EGPA patients.
In conclusion, targeted therapies with anti-interleukin-5 or anti-interleukin-5R? seem safe and promising in short-term and medium-term treatment of selected adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. The long-term safety of these agents is an important issue that needs to be addressed in the light of recent evidence of antitumor activity of eosinophils.
Identification of novel biomarkers, in addition to sputum and blood eosinophilia, will allow a more selective identification of patients responsive to these treatments. Ongoing studies will provide information whether interleukin-5/interleukin-5R? inhibition is safe and efficacious in children with eosinophilic asthma and selected patients with EGPA or COPD.
Several biologics, small molecules, and a GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3)-specific DNA enzyme [103?] are advancing in clinical trials that would meet the criteria referred to as personalized or precision medicine treatment for patients with eosinophilic respiratory disorders (Table ?(Table4)4) [104â121].
Excitement is growing that within the next few years several biologics specifically targeting interleukin-5 pathway may become approved for clinical use in selected patients with eosinophilic inflammation. This will possibly happen when a wider range of specific biomarkers will lead us to more precisely identify patients eligible for treatment with these biologic drugs [122?].NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion
Strategy | Target | Drug | Antieosinophil effects | References |
Cell-surface protein | Siglec-8 | Anti-Siglec-8 monoclonal antibody | Apoptosis | Nutku et al. [104]; Bochner et al. [105] |
CD172a | Inhibitor of signaling | Verjan Garcia et al. [106] | ||
CD300a | Activation of inhibitory receptor | Munitz et al. [19] | ||
Immunoglobulin -like receptor B | Munitz et al. [107] | |||
?4?1, ?4?7 | Natalizumab | Increase blood eosinophils and inhibits their tissue accumulation | Abbas et al. [108] | |
?4?7 integrin | Vedolizumab | No effect | Soler et al. [109] | |
?4?7, ?E?7 | Etrolizumab | Unknown | ||
CCR3 | GW766944 | Block chemokine-induced eosinophils in vitro; no effect in vivo | Neighbour et al. [110] | |
CD52 | Alemtuzumab | Deplete eosinophils in vivo | Wechsler et al. [25] | |
CD131 | CSL311 | Unknown | ||
CRTH2 | 0C000459 | Reduces tissue eosinophils | ||
ACT-453859 | CRTH2 blockade | Gehin et al. [111] | ||
EMR1 | Afucosylated anti EMR1 monoclonal antibody | Deplete primate eosinophils | Legrand et al. [20] | |
Interleukin-4R? | Dupilumab | Reduces airway eosinophils | Wenzel et al. [112] | |
Interleukin-4R? | AMG-317 | Does not reduce airway eosinophils | Corren et al. [113] | |
H4 Receptor | UR-63325 JNJ 28610244 | Salcedo et al. [114]; Dib et al. [115] | ||
Soluble mediator antagonist | Eotaxin-1 | Bertilimumab | Inhibits Eotaxin-1 mediated eosinophil activation in vitro | Ding et al. [116] |
IgE | Omalizumab | Reduces eosinophils at sites of allergic inflammation and peripheral blood | Detoraki et al. [102] | |
Interleukin-4 | Altrakincept; Pascolizumab; Pitrakinra | Reduce eosinophils at sites of allergic inflammation | Borish et al. [117]; Hart et al. [118] | |
Interleukin-13 | Tralokinumab; Lebrikizumab; Anrukinzumab; RPC4046; QAX576 | Reduce eosinophils in blood and at sites of allergic inflammation | Blanchard et al. [119]; Maselli et al. [120] | |
TSLP | AMG157 | Reduce eosinophils in blood and at sites of allergic inflammation | Gauvreau et al. [121] | |
Transcription factor | GATA3 | SB010 | Reduce interleukin-5 and late asthmatic response after allergen challenge | Krug et al. [103?] |
We apologize to the many authors who have contributed importantly to this field and whose work has not been cited due to space limitations.
The work was partly supported by grants from Regione Campania CISI-Lab Project, CRèME Project, TIMING Project, and Associazione Ricerca Malattie Allergiche e Immunologiche (ARMIA).
This week you have learned about common cardiovascular disorders in the Adult and Geriatric patients. For the purpose of this discussion select one of the following cardiovascular disorders and provide the following in your initial post:
Cardiovascular disorders:
This week you have learned about common GI disorders in the Adult and Geriatric patients. For the purpose of this discussion select one of the following GI disorders and provide the following in your initial post:
GI disorders:
This week you have learned about common GU and Male Reproductive disorders in the Adult and Geriatric patient. For this discussion, select one of the following GU and Male Reproductive disorders and provide the following in your initial post:
GU and Male Reproductive disorders:
This week you have learned about common Dermatology disorders in the Adult and Geriatric patient. For the purpose of this discussion select one of the following Dermatology and provide the following in your initial post:
Common Signs and symptoms seen
Screening assessment tools
Recommended diagnostic tests (if any)
Treatment plans both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic based on current clinical practice guidelines
Dermatology:
NSG6420 Week 3 respiratory disorder discussion