NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest

NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest

NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest

Module I Discussion

Compare and contrast the steps taken to conduct a study from a quantitative and qualitative perspective.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

Module II Discussion

Create a problem statement based on a clinical issue (one short paragraph). Next, develop a purpose statement. Critique each other.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

Module III Discussion

Choose a nurse theorist and state why the theorist has made the most valuable contributions to nursing research.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

ORDER NSG 502 All Modules Discussions latest NOW

Discussions Rubric

Criteria Ratings

Content 1.5 pts

Above Average

• Posts explicitly address the questions and demonstrates the student’s understanding and application of course content.
• Posts are relevant to the discussions at hand and provide an organized, thorough, and thoughtful reaction to instructor and/or student commentary, professional articles, and/or course text(s). 1.2 pts

Average

• Posts address the case questions and demonstrate the student’s beginning understanding and application of course content.
• Posts are relevant to the discussions at hand and make some reference to instructor and/or student commentary, professional articles, and/or course text(s). 0.9 pts

Below Average NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest

• Posts minimally address discussion questions and minimally demonstrate the student’s beginning understanding and application of course content.
• Posts lack relevance to the discussions at hand and fail to provide minimal reaction to instructor and/or student commentary, professional articles, and/or course text(s). 0.6 pts

Unsatisfactory

• Posts minimally address discussion questions and minimally demonstrate the student’s beginning understanding and application of course content.
• Posts are not relevant to the discussions at hand and fail to provide reaction to instructor and/or student commentary, professional articles, and/or course text(s). 0 pts

Not Completed

• Student did not complete the assignment.

Contribution to Learning Community 1.5 pts

Above Average

• Posts reflect the student’s clinical reasoning skills and synthesis of course material and peer comments both in class and online by: posing engaging questions; eliciting additional responses; and otherwise engaging others in the learning of course material. 1.2 pts

Average

• Posts reflect the student’s clinical reasoning skills and application of course material.
• Some effort is made to engage others in the learning of course material by making some reference to and integration of others’ posts. 0.9 pts

Below Average

• Posts minimally reflect the students clinical reasoning skills and application of course material.
• Minimal effort is made to engage others in the learning of course material by making reference to and integration of others’ posts. 0.6 pts

Unsatisfactory

• Posts reflect little to no synthesis of course material and peer comments.
• Student does not attempt to engage others in the learning of course material through posing questions or eliciting additional responses. 0 pts

Not Completed

• Student does not complete the assignment.

Promptness 1 pts

Above Average

• An original post is submitted by Wednesday at 11:30 p.m. and a reaction to 2 other posts, by Friday at 11:30 p.m. 0.8 pts

Average

• Student completes original post by Wednesday at 11:30 pm, but only responds to one classmates by Friday 11:30 pm. or Student completes original post after Wednesday by 11:30 pm and responds to two classmates by Friday at 11:30 pm. 0.6 pts

Below Average NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest

• Student posts the original post by Wednesday at 11:30 pm, but does not respond to other students by Friday at 11:30 pm. 0.4 pts  NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest

Unsatisfactory

• Student posts the original posts after Wednesday at 11:30 pm and does not respond to other students by Friday at 11:30 pm. 0 pts

Not Completed

• Student does not complete the assignment.

References 1 pts

Above Average

• Original posts need to include two references with one reference outside of the textbook.
• All responses to other students should include at least one reference and at least one of those references should be outside of the textbook. 0.8 pts

Average

• Original posts need to include one reference.
• All responses to other students should include one reference. 0.6 pts

Below Average

• Original posts should include one reference.
• Response to one other student should include one reference. 0.4 pts

Unsatisfactory

• Original post includes one reference.
• Student does not provide references when responding to other students. 0 pts

Not Completed NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest

• References are not provided for original post or responses.

Total Points: 5

Module IV Discussion

Compare and contrast the use of objectives, questions, or hypotheses used in quantitative and qualitative articles.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section. NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest

Module V Discussion

Conduct a literature search and provide an example of an ethical violation or research misconduct. Describe the event, supply the reference, and discuss what should have been done to prevent the problem from occurring.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

Module VI Discussion

Spend fifteen minutes in a busy environment (mall, park, shopping market, etc.) observing the surroundings. In the role of participant as observer, write your observations from a qualitative data collection perspective.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

Module VII Discussion

Select a quantitative research design and formulate a research question that is congruent with that design. Explain your choice.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

Module VIII Discussion

Construct a research question and select a sampling method. Explain why you selected the specific sampling method and discuss strengths and weaknesses.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

Module IX Discussion

Select a concept you wish to measure.Develop a five-item questionnaire based on the criteria in the chapter. Critique each other.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

Module X Discussion

Explain how performing a power analysis reduces the possibility of making a Type I and Type II Error.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest

Module XI Discussion

Construct a quantitative research question and state the appropriate statistical test that should be conducted and why.

Post your initial response by Wednesday at midnight. Respond to one student by Sunday at midnight. Both responses should be a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of 2 references are required (other than your text). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

 

Discussions Rubric
Criteria	Ratings
Content	1.5 pts Above Average Posts explicitly address the questions and demonstrates the student’s understanding and application of course content. Posts are relevant to the discussions at hand and provide an organized, thorough, and thoughtful reaction to instructor and/or student commentary, professional articles, and/or course text(s). 1.2 pts Average Posts address the case questions and demonstrate the student’s beginning understanding and application of course content. Posts are relevant to the discussions at hand and make some reference to instructor and/or student commentary, professional articles, and/or course text(s). 0.9 pts Below Average Posts minimally address discussion questions and minimally demonstrate the student’s beginning understanding and application of course content. Posts lack relevance to the discussions at hand and fail to provide minimal reaction to instructor and/or student commentary, professional articles, and/or course text(s). 0.6 pts Unsatisfactory Posts minimally address discussion questions and minimally demonstrate the student’s beginning understanding and application of course content. Posts are not relevant to the discussions at hand and fail to provide reaction to instructor and/or student commentary, professional articles, and/or course text(s). 0 pts Not Completed Student did not complete the assignment.
Contribution to Learning Community	1.5 pts Above Average Posts reflect the student’s clinical reasoning skills and synthesis of course material and peer comments both in class and online by: posing engaging questions; eliciting additional responses; and otherwise engaging others in the learning of course material. 1.2 pts Average Posts reflect the student’s clinical reasoning skills and application of course material. Some effort is made to engage others in the learning of course material by making some reference to and integration of others’ posts. 0.9 pts Below Average Posts minimally reflect the students clinical reasoning skills and application of course material. Minimal effort is made to engage others in the learning of course material by making reference to and integration of others’ posts. 0.6 pts Unsatisfactory Posts reflect little to no synthesis of course material and peer comments. Student does not attempt to engage others in the learning of course material through posing questions or eliciting additional responses. 0 pts Not Completed Student does not complete the assignment.
Promptness	1 pts Above Average An original post is submitted by Wednesday at 11:30 p.m. and a reaction to 2 other posts, by Friday at 11:30 p.m. 0.8 pts Average Student completes original post by Wednesday at 11:30 pm, but only responds to one classmates by Friday 11:30 pm. or Student completes original post after Wednesday by 11:30 pm and responds to two classmates by Friday at 11:30 pm. NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest 0.6 pts Below Average Student posts the original post by Wednesday at 11:30 pm, but does not respond to other students by Friday at 11:30 pm. 0.4 pts Unsatisfactory Student posts the original posts after Wednesday at 11:30 pm and does not respond to other students by Friday at 11:30 pm. 0 pts Not Completed Student does not complete the assignment.
References	1 pts Above Average Original posts need to include two references with one reference outside of the textbook. All responses to other students should include at least one reference and at least one of those references should be outside of the textbook. 0.8 pts Average Original posts need to include one reference. All responses to other students should include one reference. 0.6 pts Below Average Original posts should include one reference. Response to one other student should include one reference. 0.4 pts Unsatisfactory Original post includes one reference. Student does not provide references when responding to other students. 0 pts Not Completed References are not provided for original post or responses.
Total Points: 5

NSG502 All Modules Discussions latest