Contact us:
+1 (520) 226-8615
Email:
[email protected]
NSG 6001 -Managing Delirium Question
What are initial approaches when managing delirium in a hospitalized patient who is agitated and confused?
NSG 6001 Knowledge Check Week 1
1. Which of the following best describes the objective portion of a SOAP note?
2. A 50-year-old female patient has a blood pressure of 118/72mm Hg, a negative family history for breast and ovarian cancer, a normal Pap smear 2 years prior and a Framingham Risk screening within normal limits. Which should be part of this patient’s routine annual well-patient exams?
3. An asymptomatic 63-year-old female has a low-density lipoprotein level of 135 mg/dL. Which test is beneficial to asses this patient’s coronary artery disease risk?
4. A patient reports abdominal and back pain with anorexia and nausea. During an exam, the provider notes a pulsatile abdominal mass. What is the initial action?
5. An elderly female without prior history of cardiovascular disease reports lower leg soreness and fatigue when shopping or walking in the neighborhood. The primary care provider notes decreased pedal pulses bilaterally. Which test will the provider order initially to evaluate for peripheral arterial disease based on these symptoms?
Institution & Term/Date | |
Term/Date | South University |
Criteria Actual/Possible points
Organization:
Introduction (2.5 points each): 5 /5
__x Cited Attention Getter __ Not cited Attention Getter
_x_ Clear Thesis statement __ No or Unclear thesis statement
Body(5 points each): 6 /10
__x Clear topic sentence __ Unclear topic sentences
__ Effective transitions x__ No transitions
Conclusion (2.5 points each): 5 /5
x__ Paraphrases Central Idea __ Exact C.I. restatement or nothing
x__ Explicitly ties back to A.G. __ no tie back
Analysis (10 points each): 20 /40
__x ‘ism’ thoroughly described __ unclear/ perfunctory description
_ Rhetorical appeals Analyzed x_ unclear analysis
__ Target Audience analyzed x__ No/inaccurate audience analysis
_x_ Critical cultural elements __ No analysis of critical cultural elements
Writing: 10 /10
_x_ Grammar/ spelling Correct __ Grammatical/ spelling errors
Within constraints:
1,000-1,500 words/ word count included after the works cited/references 15 /15
Cites following APA (references) or MLA (works cited) 15 /15
***PAPERS UNDER 1000 WORDS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
Total: 76/100= __22.8_/30
You have a decent introduction, but are missing an attention getter. Your thesis is almost there— but it needed to be a little bit clearer about what you mean “in regard to the three waves of feminism.” Remember that the requirement of the paper is to analyze the rhetorical arguments made by “feminism” so it would be useful for your thesis to clearly explain your position on the topic as well as a preview of what the essay will cover. For example, “this essay argues for/against feminism by first explaining what utopia is, then_____, and finally by _____.”
Secondly, you need to use transitions to increase the flow and clarity of your essay. After the first paragraph you could have written “the next paragraph will explain______” and that would have been sufficient. You provide a history of how feminism is useful but only provide one citation. Make sure you cite these things because they are not common knowledge and may make readers suspicious of unattributed facts (as not being credible) or worse, as plagiarism.
KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
While I appreciate your contemplation of the uses of feminism, it would be useful if you followed the essay requirements and analyzed the rhetorical moves that feminism offers (ethos, pathos, logos, what fallacies are present? Etc). All of your paragraphs could use clearer transitions at the end of each paragraph to summarize the previous paragraph and introduce the next topic. The essay would have benefitted from a more apt analysis of the rhetorical techniques used by feminism— specifically what is the motivating factor in mobilizing people? What technique is being used there?
How is ethos, pathos, and logos being used to garner support? That was the assignment. Your writing is good and well researched, but it misses many of the requirements of this assignment. You provide many examples that do not explicitly connect to the thesis or the argument. Finally, your conclusion is good, but the entire essay misses the requirement of analyzing the rhetorical devices and techniques used in feminism. It seems as if the essay was written for a different course.