Contact us:
+1 (520) 226-8615

Email:
[email protected]

NSG 3036 Wk3 Assignment2 Rubric

NSG 3036 Wk3 Assignment2 Rubric

NSG 3036 Wk3 Assignment2 Rubric

 

  Unsatisfactory

1

 Emerging

2

 Proficient

3

 Exemplary

4

 Score
Assignment Components
Described the sample in the study chosen in W1

Assignment 3.

 Report did not describe the sample in the study chosen in W1

Assignment 3.

 Report described the sample in the study chosen in W1

Assignment 3. The description was short and missed several details.

 Report described the sample in the study chosen in W1

Assignment 3

accurately. More

details could have been provided.

 Report described the sample in the study chosen in W1

Assignment 3 well. Accurate and adequate details were provided.

 [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Described the sample characteristics (demographics) in the study. Minimal or no characteristics were described. The description missed several characteristics. The description included most characteristics. The description included all characteristics and demonstrates a clear understanding of the study. [Score x 4 = 16 pts]
Discussed the data collection process used in the study. Minimal or no discussion was provided on the data collection process. The discussion included an outline of the data collection process used in the study. The discussion included a clear and complete data

collection process used in the study.

 The discussion included a clear, detailed, and complete data collection process used in the study. [Score x 3 = 12 pts]
Identified the sampling design. The identified sampling design is incomplete and not too clear. The identified sampling design is somewhat clear and correct. The identified sampling design is clear and correct. The identified sampling design is clear and detailed and demonstrates a deep understanding of the study. [Score x 3 = 12 pts]
Described the instrument or tool or survey used in the article. Minimal or no description was included on the instrument or tool or survey. Description was included on the instrument or tool or survey. However, the description missed several details. Description was included on the instrument or tool or survey. The description included most details. A clear and detailed description was included on the instrument or tool or survey. [Score x 3 = 12 pts]
Summarized the discussion regarding Vaguely summarized the discussion of the Summarized the discussion of the Summarized the discussion of the Summarized the discussion of the [Score x 3 = 12 pts]

 

 

 

the validity and

reliability of the instrument.

 reliability and validity of

the instrument.

 reliability and validity of

the instrument with minimum details.

 reliability and validity of

the instrument with most details.

 reliability and validity of

the instrument with complete and well- supported details.

  
Written Components
Organization Introduction Thesis Transitions Conclusion Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

 

The paper lacks a thesis statement.

 

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

 

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

 Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

 

The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.

 

Transitions are sporadic.

 

Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.

 Introduction has a clear opening, provides background

information, and states the topic.

 

The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.

 

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

 

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

 Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling

and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.

 

The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.

 

Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.

 

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

 [Score x 2 = 8 pts]
Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling

Sentence structure

 Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. [Score x 2 =8 pts]
APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations No attempt at APA

format.

 APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted,

and cited in many spots

 Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout [Score x 1 = 4 pts]

 

 

 

    significant. throughout when

appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.

 the presentation when

appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present.

  
         

Subtotal

  
Timeliness         Late Work penalty:
         

 

 

Total Score

  

/ 100

ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER WITH ALL INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOWED