NRS 441 Wk1 Complete Assignment Papers

NRS 441 Wk1 Complete Assignment

NRS 441 Wk1 Complete Assignment

NRS 441 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 1

Enter key words for your topic (from this module’s assignment) into the CINAHL database. Explore the results yielded by your search. Examine the various options and tools available on the results page to further refine your search. Discuss how you used this information to locate the most relevant information for your assignment.

NRS 441 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 2

Describe two techniques that you can apply to narrow or broaden a search. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each. Which approach will improve the effectiveness of your searches?

NRS 441 Grand Canyon Week 1 Assignment 1

Identifying a Problem

Details:

Prepare for the capstone project by listening to the audio interview, “Capstone: Planning Your Project”.

Preview and utilize the “Topic 1 Checklist.” This resource will assist you in organizing your work and will provide additional information regarding the assignment.

Consider the clinical environment in which you are currently working or have recently worked. Collaborate with a leader or educator in the clinical environment to identify a problem, issue, or educational deficit upon which to build a proposal for change.

In a paper of no more than 800 words, describe the nature of the problem, issue, or educational deficit. Include the following in your discussion:

1- The setting and/or context in which the problem, issue, or educational deficit can be observed.

2- Detailed description of the problem, issue, or educational deficit.

3- Impact of the problem, issue, or educational deficit on the work environment, the quality of care provided by staff, and patient outcomes.

4- Gravity of the problem, issue, or educational deficit and its significance to nursing.

5- Proposed solution to address the problem, issue, or educational deficit.

Prepare for the capstone project by listening to the audio interview, “Capstone: Planning Your Project”, located at.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs441v_capstone.php” href=”http://lc.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs441v_capstone.php”>http://lc.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs441v_capstone.php.

Review “Topic 1: Checklist.” This resource will assist you in organizing your work and will provide additional information regarding the assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER WITH ALL INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOWED

NRS 441 Wk1 Complete Assignment Topic 1: Checklist

Identifying a Problem, Developing a Question, and Selecting Sources of Literature

Instructions:

This checklist is designed to help students organize the weekly exercises/assignments to be completed as preparation for the final, capstone project proposal. This checklist will also serve as a communication tool between students and faculty. Comments, feedback and grading for modules 1-4 will be documented using this checklist.

Rapid Appraisal

Perform a rapid appraisal of each article by answering the following questions (one to two sentences are sufficient to answer each question):

1) How does each article describe the nature of the problem, issue, or deficit you have identified?

2) Does each article provide statistical information to demonstrate the gravity of the issue, problem, or deficit?

3) Example(s): morbidity, mortality, rate of incidence or rate of occurrence in the general population.

4) Does each article support your proposed change?

NRS 441 Wk1 Complete Assignment – Week 1 Assignment 2

Selecting Sources of Literature

Locate a minimum of 15 peer-reviewed articles that describe the problem or issue and that support the proposed solution. Eight of the 15 articles must be research-based (e.g., a study which is qualitative, quantitative, descriptive, or longitudinal).

Hint: Begin your search for literature by utilizing the databases located in the GCU Library. Contact your faculty member, the librarian, or library staff for additional researching tips and key word suggestions.

Preview each of the 15 articles chosen by reading the article abstracts and summaries.

Hint: Article abstracts and summaries provide a concise description of the topic, research outcomes, and significance of findings.

Hint: Refer to “RefWorks” and “Topic 1: Checklist.”

Perform a rapid appraisal of each article by answering the following questions (one to two sentences are sufficient to answer each question):

1- How does each article describe the nature of the problem, issue, or deficit you have identified?

2- Does each article provide statistical information to demonstrate the gravity of the issue, problem, or deficit?

3- What are example(s) of morbidity, mortality, and rate of incidence or rate of occurrence in the general population?

4- Does each article support your proposed change?

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Topic 1: Checklist

Identifying a Problem, Developing a Question, and Selecting Sources of Literature

Instructions:

This checklist is designed to help students organize the weekly exercises/assignments to be completed as preparation for the final, capstone project proposal. This checklist will also serve as a communication tool between students and faculty. Comments, feedback and grading for modules 1-4 will be documented using this checklist.

Rapid Appraisal

Perform a rapid appraisal of each article by answering the following questions (one to two sentences are sufficient to answer each question):

1) How does each article describe the nature of the problem, issue, or deficit you have identified?

2) Does each article provide statistical information to demonstrate the gravity of the issue, problem, or deficit?

3) Example(s): morbidity, mortality, rate of incidence or rate of occurrence in the general population.

4) Does each article support your proposed change?

NRS 441 Week5 Complete Assignments

NRS 441 Grand Canyon Week 5 Discussion 1

Discuss the rationale for a dissemination plan for a research or evidence-based project.

NRS 441 Grand Canyon Week 5 Discussion 2

Based on your experience with this course, how important is the knowledge of the research process to you in your continued practice of nursing?

NRS 441 Grand Canyon Week 5 Assignment

Constructing the Written Evidence-Based Proposal: Final assignment

Combine all elements completed in previous weeks (Topics 1-4) into one cohesive evidence-based proposal and share the proposal with a leader in your organization. (Appropriate individuals include unit managers, department directors, clinical supervisors, charge nurses, and clinical educators.)

Obtain feedback from the leader you have selected and request verification using the Capstone Review Form. Submit the signed Capstone Review Form to .edu”>[email protected].

For information on how to complete the assignment, refer to “Writing Guidelines” and the “Exemplar of Evidence-Based Practice Capstone Paper.”

Include a title page, abstract, problem statement, conclusion, reference section, and appendices (if tables, graphs, surveys, diagrams, etc. are created from tools required in Topic 4).

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center

Grading Rubric: Practice Issue – NRS 441 Wk1 Complete Assignment

Assignment Criteria	A (100%)Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance	B (88%)Exceeds Very good or high level of performance	C (80%)Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance	NI (38%)Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance	F (0%)Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance
Practice issue statement, scope of practice, practice area 20 points	Practice issue is identified based on the systematic review topic chosen. Practice issue is an independent nursing decision. Scope of practice issue is fully described. Practice area identified. 20 points ?	Practice issue is identified but is not clear, however it is based on the systematic review topic chosen. Practice issue is an independent nursing decision. Scope of practice issue is described in simple terms. Practice area identified. 18 points ?	Practice issue is identified but is not clearly related to a nursing practice issue, however it is based on the systematic review topic chosen. Practice issue is not an independent nursing decision. Scope of practice issue is described but is not logical in comparison to Practice Issue described. Practice area identified. 16 points ?	Practice issue is unclear. Practice issue is not based on the systematic review topic. Practice Issue is not an independent nursing decision. Scope of practice issue is not described. Practice area identified. 8 points ?	Practice issue is not identified; practice issue is not an independent nursing decision; scope of practice issue is not described; practice area is not identified. 0 points ?
Practice issue identification, rationale for selections 35 points	Documents how the practice issue was identified. Rationale for responses is logical and described thoroughly.35 points ?	Documents how the practice issue was identified. Rationale for responses is logical and briefly described.33 points ?	Documents how the practice issue was identified. Rationale for responses is some what logical and vaguely described.30 points ?	Vaguely describes how the practice issue was identified. Rationale for responses is somewhat logical and vaguely described. 15 points ?	Does not document how the practice issue was identified. Rationale is not completed. This section of the form is blank. 0 points ?
Types of evidence to gather, rationale for selections 20 points	Identifies and documents what types of evidence is needed for review. Thoroughly describes rationale for all checked types of evidence selected.20 points ?	Identifies and documents what types of evidence is needed for review. Briefly describes rationale for all checked types of evidence selected.18 points ?	Identifies and documents what types of evidence is needed but includes only a minimum description for rationale for selected evidence.16 points ?	Does not document more than one type of evidence that is needed for review and does not include rationale for selected type of evidence.8 points ?	Does not document types of evidence or rationale. 0 points ?
Total Points Possible = 75 points