NR 601 Week 3 DQ -Geriatric Assessment Tools

NR 601 Week 3 DQ -Geriatric Assessment Tools

NR 601 Week 3 DQ -Geriatric Assessment Tools

Review the course library page list of available screening tools.

1. Explain the purpose of the tool
2. Scoring guidelines
3. How you apply the assessment in practice

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Criteria                                                                                                                                         Actual/Possible points

Organization:

Introduction (2.5 points each):                                                                                                            5          /5

__x Cited Attention Getter               __ Not cited Attention Getter

_x_ Clear Thesis statement              __ No or Unclear thesis statement

Body(5 points each):                                                                                                                         6        /10

__x Clear topic sentence                  __ Unclear topic sentences

__ Effective transitions                    x__ No transitions

Conclusion (2.5 points each):                                                                                                             5             /5

x__ Paraphrases Central Idea           __ Exact C.I. restatement or nothing

x__ Explicitly ties back to A.G.       __ no tie back

Analysis (10 points each):                                                                                                                             20        /40

__x  ‘ism’ thoroughly described      __ unclear/ perfunctory description

_ Rhetorical appeals  Analyzed                      x_ unclear analysis

__ Target Audience analyzed                        x__ No/inaccurate  audience analysis

_x_ Critical cultural elements                        __ No analysis of critical cultural elements

NR 601 Week 3 DQ -Geriatric Assessment Tools

Writing:                                                                                                                                                                10        /10

_x_ Grammar/ spelling Correct       __ Grammatical/ spelling errors

Within constraints:

1,000-1,500 words/ word count included after the works cited/references                                                        15     /15

Cites following APA (references) or MLA (works cited)                                                                15         /15

***PAPERS UNDER 1000 WORDS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.

Assignment Requirements

Before finalizing your work, you should:

• Minimum requirement of at least 5 sources of support
• be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
• consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and
• utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.

You have a decent introduction, but are missing an attention getter.  Your thesis is almost there— but it needed to be a little bit clearer about what you mean. Remember that the requirement of the paper is to analyze the rhetorical arguments made so it would be useful for your thesis to clearly explain your position on the topic as well as a preview of what the essay will cover. For example, “this essay argues for/against XXX by first explaining what utopia is, then_____, and finally by _____.” Secondly, you need to use transitions to increase the flow and clarity of your essay. After the first paragraph you could have written “the next paragraph will explain______” and that would have been sufficient.