Contact us:
+1 (520) 226-8615
Email:
[email protected]
NR 536 Developing Critical Thinking Questions Assignment
The Developing Critical Thinking Questions assignment is due on Sunday of Week 3 at 11:59 p.m. MT. The guidelines and rubric are listed below, as well as in the downloadable document.
Developing Critical Thinking Questions Guidelines and RubricPreview the document
Developing Critical Thinking Questions Template (Links to an external site.)
Week 3: Developing Critical Thinking Questions
This assignment provides the student with the opportunity to select a concept and then develop questions that will foster critical thinking and clinical decision making in future learners. Each of the questions must demonstrate the Socratic format. By having a question in each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment, the student will review content related to the selected concept.
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to do the following.
CO 1: Synthesize educational theories and knowledge from nursing and health sciences to foster experiential learning strategies and positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1)
CO 2: Integrate pathophysiologic mechanisms with advanced assessment and pharmacologic concepts to maximize holistic, person-centered outcomes in complex disease states. (POs 1, 2, 3, 5)
CO 4: Employ a spirit of inquiry to foster professional development to facilitate the achievement of educational outcomes. (PO 3)
CO 6: Promote positive health and education outcomes by fostering the use of evidenced-based and interprofessional strategies in experiential settings. (PO 5)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3
Description of the Assignment
This assignment requires the student to develop a learning activity that fosters critical thinking in future learners. For each of the identified areas, the student will develop a question that applies information from pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment.
Criteria for Content
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
Assignment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
Problem Recognition
|
35 | 23 | Required content:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted |
Clinical Decision Making
|
35 | 23 | Required content:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted |
Prioritization
|
35 | 23 | Required content:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted |
Clinical Intervention
|
35 | 23 | Required content:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted |
Graduate-Level Writing Style
|
10 | 07 | · Correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation
· Exceptional writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information throughout the paper · Congruence with APA mechanics of style · APA format for citing and referencing sources |
Total | 150 | 100% |
Assignment Criteria |
Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance |
Meets
Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement
Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance |
Content
Possible Points = 140 Points |
|||||
Problem Recognition
|
35 Points | 31 Points | 28 Points | 13 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information was good and included all of the following elements but was superficial in places:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information was noted in all of the following elements but was only minimally demonstrated:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
|
Clinical Decision Making
|
35 Points | 31 Points | 28 Points | 13 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information was good and included all of the following elements but was superficial in places:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted |
Presentation of information was noted in all of the following elements but was only minimally demonstrated:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
|
Prioritization
|
35 Points | 31 Points | 28 Points | 13 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information was good and included all of the following elements but was superficial in places:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted |
Presentation of information was noted in all of the following elements but was only minimally demonstrated:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
|
Clinical Intervention
|
35 Points | 31 Points | 28 Points | 13 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information was good and included all of the following elements but was superficial in places:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information was noted in all of the following elements but was only minimally demonstrated:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements:
· Questions are consistent with Socratic style · One question for each of the areas of pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment · Answer is consistent with the concept, expectations for learner, and area · Reference for the answer is noted
|
|
Content Subtotal _____ of 140 Points | |||||
Format
Possible Points = 10 Points |
|||||
Criteria
Scholarly writing at the graduate level
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points |
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA Manual | 3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA Manual.
|
5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA Manual
|
7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA Manual
|
9 or more errors or exceptions to the rules of APA citation style, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA Manual
|
Format Subtotal_____ of 10 Points | |
Total Points | _____ of 150 Points |