N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

PURPOSE

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete an analysis of a concept found in the Nurse Practitioner role supported by a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (CO 1)?

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and the application to advanced nursing practice. (CO 4)

Due Date: Sun., 11:59pm MT

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

Total Points Possible: 200

REQUIREMENTS

Description of the Assignment?

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of?ONE?concept that is important and useful to the nurse practitioner role.? The concept for this assignment must be supported by a published?nursing?theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application as demonstrated through the creation of model, borderline, and contrary cases.? Theoretical applications of the concept are also discussed. Non-nursing theories may?NOT?be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.??Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.??

Criteria for Content?

Introduction- The introduction substantively presents all the following elements:??

Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.?

Identifies the selected?nursing?concept.?

Identifies the?nursing?theory that addresses the selected concept.?

Names the sections of the paper.?

Scholarly support is required.?

Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept?

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).?

A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.?

Literature review?

A substantive discussion of?at least 6 (six)?scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.?

Support from nursing literature is required.?

Please Note:?Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.?

Defining attributes,?for this section:? A minimum of?THREE (3)?attributes are required.?

A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required. Explanation:? An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. ?For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.?

Antecedent and Consequence?

1 antecedent?of the selected nursing concept.?

1 consequence?of the selected nursing concept.?

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.?Explanation:?An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event.? In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept. A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation, a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.? N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

Empirical Referents?

Two (2)?empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.?

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.? Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.?

Construct Cases?

Explanation:?Hypothetical or real-life situations demonstrating the use or absence of the concept.?This section requires the creation of a model case, borderline case, and contrary case. Construct cases should be from the viewpoint of an advanced practice NP.

1 Model Case?is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:?

Definition

All identified attributes. Explanation:??A model case is an example of a hypothetical or real-life situation that demonstrates all of the attributes noted previously in this assignment.?

Borderline Case?is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.?

1 Contrary Case?is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this?case. Explanation:? Borderline case is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. Contrary case is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept – all identified attributes are missing.?

Theoretical Applications of the Concept?

Discuss the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.?

Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.?

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.?

Conclusion?

Summarization of key information regarding:?

Selected nursing concept.?

Selected nursing theory.?

Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing, specifically as an NP.?

The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)?

N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 6, but no more than 8 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.

A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance. Please note: the concepts of incivility and civility are not allowed for this assignment. N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

Adaptation Burnout Caring Comfort Compassion Compassion fatigue

Competence Cultural humility Empowerment Engagement Health Leadership

Meaningfulness Modeling Noise Pain Palliative care

Quality of life Resilience Self-care Sensory overload Situational awareness

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category	Points	%	Description
Introduction	8	4	The introduction substantively presents all the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development Identifies the selected nursing concept Identifies the nursing theory that addresses the selected concept Names the sections of the paper Scholarly support is required
Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept	20	10	This section includes: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
Literature Review	28	14	This section requires: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion. Support from nursing literature is required.
Defining Attributes	20	10	For this section: A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required. A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required
Antecedent & Consequence	20	10	This section requires the identification of: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Empirical Referents	16	8	This section requires the identification of: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Construct Cases	24	12	This section requires: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: Definition All identified attributes NP perspective 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
Theoretical Applications of the Concept	24	12	This section requires: Discussion of the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explanation on how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Conclusion	8	4	This section requires: Summarization of key information regarding: Selected nursing concept. Selected nursing theory. Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing specifically as an NP The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)
	168	84%	Total CONTENT Points= 168 pts
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category	Points	%	Description
Paper Specifications	16	8	A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.  Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. Paper meets length requirements of 6 to 8 pages. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references. A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
APA Format (6th edition)	8	4	Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. One deduction for each type of APA style error
Citations in Text	4	2	Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.
Writing Mechanics	4	2	Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.
	32	16%	Total FORMAT Points= 32 pts
			ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 200 points

156921834009/22/201911:59pm

File Upload

Google Doc

Tutoring

Top of Form

Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.
File:	remove empty attachment Add Another File remove empty attachment
	Click here to find a file you’ve already uploaded
I agree to the tool’s End-User License Agreement. Links to an external site. This assignment submission is my own, original work
Cancel Submit Assignment
Submitting

Bottom of Form

Before you can submit assignments directly from Google Drive you need to authorize Canvas to access your Google Drive account:

Authorize Google Drive Access

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

Rubric

true

722511

Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it.

Find a Rubric

Title: Find Rubric

NR501NP WK3 Concept Analysis_SEPT19

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

NR501NP WK3 Concept Analysis_SEPT19

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction _9597

1. Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.
2. Identifies the selected nursing concept.
3. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained.
4. A nursing theory was used.
5. Identifies the sections of the paper.
6. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

view longer description1. Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.<br/> 2. Identifies the selected nursing concept.<br/> 3. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. <br/> 4. A nursing theory was used.<br/> 5. Identifies the sections of the paper.<br/> 6. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating

7.0 to >6.0 pts

V. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

_8312

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

_9676

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one or two of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

_2605

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the required elements.

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 8.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefinition/ Explanation of Selected Concept _1705

1. Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).
2. Provides support from scholarly sources.

view longer description1. Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).<br/> 2. Provides support from scholarly sources.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

_8229

Edit ratingDelete rating

18.0 to >17.0 pts

V. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

_993

Edit ratingDelete rating

17.0 to >10.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

_5179

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements. Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

_7665

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.

_7087

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 20.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review _6305

1. A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
2. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

view longer description1. A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept.<br/> 2. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

28.0 to >25.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

_6680

Edit ratingDelete rating

25.0 to >23.0 pts

V. Good

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

_9686

Edit ratingDelete rating

23.0 to >14.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements. Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

_7948

Edit ratingDelete rating

14.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

_1977

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.

_5082

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 28.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefining Attributes _7563

1. A minimum of 3 (three) attributes
2. Support from scholarly sources provided.

view longer description1. A minimum of 3 (three) attributes<br/> 2. Support from scholarly sources provided.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the required elements.

_2784

Edit ratingDelete rating

18.0 to >17.0 pts

V. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

_9036

Edit ratingDelete rating

17.0 to >10.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

_294

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

_8721

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.

_6464

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 20.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAntecedent & Consequence _454

1. 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.
2. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
3. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

view longer description1. 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. <br/> 2. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.<br/> 3. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

_3953

Edit ratingDelete rating

18.0 to >17.0 pts

V. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

_3406

Edit ratingDelete rating

17.0 to >10.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

_9980

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

_7214

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the required elements.

_6674

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 20.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEmpirical Referents _2837

1. 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.
2. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

view longer description1. 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.<br/> 2. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

16.0 to >15.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

_8607

Edit ratingDelete rating

15.0 to >13.0 pts

V. Good

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

_3649

Edit ratingDelete rating

13.0 to >8.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

_6085

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations. N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

_945

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.

_5937

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 16.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConstruct Cases _4515

1. 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:
• Definition
• All identified attributes
2. 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
3. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

view longer description1. 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:<br/> • Definition<br/> • All identified attributes<br/> 2. 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.<br/> 3. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

24.0 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

_7999

Edit ratingDelete rating

22.0 to >20.0 pts

V. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

_748

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >12.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

_2083

Edit ratingDelete rating

12.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

_6166

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the required elements.

_7279

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 24.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Applications of the Concept _2725

1. Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.
2. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.
3. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

view longer description1. Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.<br/> 2. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.<br/> 3. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

24.0 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

_6374

Edit ratingDelete rating

22.0 to >20.0 pts

V. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

_4162

Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >12.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the required elements.

_6014

Edit ratingDelete rating

12.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

_5054

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the required elements.

_52

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 24.0 pts

—

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion 167344_4763

1. Summarizes information on selected nursing concept.
2. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.
3. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.
4. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

view longer description1. Summarizes information on selected nursing concept.<br/> 2. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.<br/> 3. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.<br/> 4. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

167344_7786

Edit ratingDelete rating

7.0 to >6.0 pts

V. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

167344_4463

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the required elements.

167344_5080

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one or two of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

167344_5707

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the required elements.

167344_4069

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 8.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row. N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specifications 167344_9093

1. A nursing theory was used.
2. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.
3. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page.
4. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references
5. A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.
6. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

view longer description1. A nursing theory was used.<br/> 2. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. <br/> 3. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page.<br/> 4. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references<br/> 5. A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.<br/> 6. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

16.0 to >15.0 pts

Excellent

This section included all of the required elements.

167344_4202

Edit ratingDelete rating

15.0 to >13.0 pts

V. Good

This section included three of the required elements.

167344_8175

Edit ratingDelete rating

13.0 to >8.0 pts

Satisfactory

This section included only two of the required elements.

167344_6545

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

This section included only one of the required elements.

167344_3696

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

This section included none of the required elements.

167344_1436

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 16.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style 167344_9606

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the:
• title page,
• running head,
• body of paper (including citations and headings), and
• reference page
One deduction for each type of APA format error. N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

view longer descriptionAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the: <br/> • title page,<br/> • running head,<br/> • body of paper (including citations and headings), and<br/> • reference page <br/> One deduction for each type of APA format error

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.0 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

0 to 1 APA error present.

167344_520

Edit ratingDelete rating

7.0 to >6.0 pts

V. Good

2-3 APA errors were present.

167344_8147

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Satisfactory

4–5 APA were are present.

167344_6558

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

6–7 APA were are present. N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

167344_8274

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

8 or greater APA errors were present.

167344_5542

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 8.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations 167344_3370

view longer description

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Excellent

1. There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 2. Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty. N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

167344_5558

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

V. Good

1. There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 2. Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.

167344_3348

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.0 pts

Satisfactory

There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.

167344_3632

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.

167344_4126

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.

167344_4004

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 4.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality 167344_2580

Grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.

view longer descriptionGrammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. N501 Week 3 Concept Analysis Assignment

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Excellent

1–2 errors.

167344_5144

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

V. Good

3 – 4 errors.

167344_1393

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.0 pts

Satisfactory

5 – 6 errors.

167344_5086

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

7 – 8 errors.

167344_3900

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

9 or greater errors.

167344_3809

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 4.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions 167344_1893

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

view longer descriptionStudents are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

Range

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0.0 pts

Manual Deductions

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

167344_2052

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Manual Deductions

167344_5872

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 0.0 pts

—

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

view longer description

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

5to >0 pts

Full Marks

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating

0to >0 pts

No Marks

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 5 pts

—

Total Points: 200.