Methods II Paper Assignment

Running head: CHOOSING A SUSPECT 1

That’s Him! Choosing a Suspect From A Lineup

A Student

Florida International University

Commented [RW1]: Make sure your title age is in correct APA format (headers, page numbers, title (you can create

your own or copy the title of the original paper), YOUR

NAME, and YOUR university affiliation

CHOOSING A SUSPECT 2

Part One

(Student example answers are in red)

1. What are the hypotheses for study one?

There were several hypotheses, though they only analyzed two of them. First, they

predicted that participants would choose a suspect more frequently in the target

present condition than when told the suspect may or may not be present or when they

were given no information about the suspect being present. Second, they predicted

that participants would be more confident in their choice than all other conditions.

2. What is the independent variable(s) for study one? Make sure you tell me how many

IVs there are and how many levels there are for each IV

There was one independent variable in study one with three levels: 1). Some

participants were given lineup instructions which said the target was present in the

lineup. 2). Some participants were given instructions in which the target “might” be

present. 3). Some participants were not given any instructions.

3. What is the dependent variable(s) for study one? Note: there are several of these, so

focus on the ones the author analyzed.

There were several of these, the three most important of which were 1). A

manipulation check in which they were asked to recall the instruction they were given

prior to the lineup. 2). Whether the participant actually chose a suspect from the

lineup. 3). How confident they there were in their lineup choice.

4. What did they find in study one? Give the general outcome

As predicted, participants who were told the participant was in the lineup were more

likely to choose a lineup suspect and were more confident in their choice than

participants in the “might” be present or no instruction conditions

5. What are the hypothesis for study two?

Like study one, the authors predicted that participants would both choose and have

more confidence in their choice than participants in the target “might” be present

condition (This second study lacked the “no instruction” condition). They also

predicted that participants would be more willing to choose a suspect and have more

confidence in that choice when there were eight lineup members compared to four

members. Finally, they predicted that those given target present instructions and an

eight person lineup would be most willing to choose and have more confident in their

choice than those in all other conditions.

6. What is the independent variable(s) for study two? Make sure you tell me how many

IVs there are and how many levels there are for each IV

Commented [RW2]: They original paper also looked at an attention check variable (did they recall the instructions), and

they found that participants paid attention to the lineup

instructions. However, this manipulation check DV isn’t as

relevant to the abstract as the two ANOVAs the author ran,

so there is no need to write about it as a hypothesis

CHOOSING A SUSPECT 3

There were two independent variables in this study. The first one was lineup

instructions (target present versus target “might” be present). The second one was the

number of participants in the lineup (eight versus four members)

7. What is the dependent variable(s) for study two? Note: there are several of these, so

focus on the ones the author analyzed.

Like study one, there were three important dependent variables. 1). A manipulation

check in which they were asked to recall the instruction they were given prior to the

lineup. 2). Whether the participant actually chose a suspect from the lineup. 3). How

confident they there were in their lineup choice.

8. What did they find in study two? Give the general outcome

Like study one, participants in the target present condition chose and were more

confident in their choice than participants in the target “might” be present condition,

but only when given an eight person lineup. The target present and target “might” be

present conditions had similar results for four person lineup conditions.

9. I want you to review the references and spot the reference(s) that is not in APA

format and rewrite it for me according to APA rules. Note: there may be as few as

zero and as many as ten incorrect references, so make sure to look at them all!

There were two incorrect APA references. They should look like the following:

Brigham, J., Ready, D., & Spier, S. (1990). Standards for evaluating the fairness of photographic

lineups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 149-163. DOI: 12323-38271

Pezdek. K., Blandon-Gitlin, I., & Moore, C. (2003). Children’s face recognition memory: More

evidence for the cross-race effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 760-763. DOI:

38765-DY2972

CHOOSING A SUSPECT 4

Abstract

Two studies looked at eyewitness confidence in lineup studies. In study one, 551 undergraduate

participants saw a picture of a target “suspect”. They then viewed an eight person lineup that

altered the lineup instructions (they were told the target was either present, might be present, or

they were not given any information, though in reality the target “suspect” was always missing).

The authors predicted that participants would both choose a suspect and be more confident in

their choice when told the target was present compared to the other two conditions. Results

confirmed this prediction. In study two, 337 participants also received either the target present or

might not be present instructions, though they were given a lineup that differed in size (eight

versus four members). Like study one, participants in the target present condition chose and were

more confident in their choice than participants in the target might be present condition, but only

when given an eight person lineup. This implies that telling someone that a person is present in a

lineup can lead them to find a suspect, but only if they have a lot of lineup choices.

Keywords: target present, target absent, simultaneous lineups, confidence, system variables

Commented [RW3]: Make sure to include the word “Abstract” at the top of the page. You don’t need to include

the phrase “Part Two” here. APA format specifies only the

word Abstract, which is centered and not bolded.

Commented [RW4]: Unlike most paragraphs in an APA formatted paper, there is no indent for the abstract

Commented [RW5]: The student wrote this in 189 words! It’s a lot of information in a short amount of space, so make

sure to edit it a lot to get all relevant information in place.

Commented [RW6]: Notice how the lines do not line up on the right side of the paragraph? That is correct APA style.

DO NOT full justify the paragraph. It lines up along the left

margin, but not the right margin

Commented [RW7]: Make sure to include your keywords!