HIM 650 Assignment: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution

HIM 650 Assignment: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution

HIM 650 Assignment: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution

In reference to your Database Design Proposal from topic 1, consider a situation where you want to track, and ultimately identify performance variances (quality measures) or the occurrence of at-risk incidents (pharmaceutical) within the environment you selected.

Write a 500-750 word proposal for an incident solution from the perspective of the Health Information Manager. Include the following criteria in your proposal:

Identify and select an incident in which you are interested.

ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOMIZED ACADEMIC PAPER

For your risk incidence solution, discuss the proposed solution and specification of the requirements.

Describe the database design and/or modifications to existing databases

Describe the required resources to develop data model, including hosting considerations.

Explain the breakdown of responsibilities among staff to collect, analyze, and disseminate the information.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. HIM 650 Assignment: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution

*** please save and send my assignment as Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution.

HIM 650 Assignment: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HIM-650	HIM-650-O500	Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution	75.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)
Module 3 Rubric: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution	100.0%
Proposal Components: Requirements, Solution, and Database Modifications	30.0%	Description and assessment of the criteria are not outlined or outlined poorly. Fails to formulate clear possibilities for change.	Minimally outlines the rationale for the design chosen and lists limitations, and possible extensions.  Ignores or superficially assesses areas of difficulty or modification needs for the database. Formulates vague and indecisive solutions.	Outlines the rationale for the solution, its requirements, limitations, and possible extensions.  A surface level assessment of the areas of difficulty or modification of the database is offered. Expresses possible solutions. Minimal detail is used.	Describes the rationale for the solution, its requirements, limitations, and possible extensions Assessment is direct, competent, and appropriate of the areas of difficulty or modifications needed for the database. Formulates possible process changes or solutions. Some details are present.	Describes in-depth the rationale for the solution, its requirements, limitations, and possible extensions. Thoughtfully assesses and evaluates areas of difficulty or modification for the database. Formulates clear and precise process changes. Details and examples are present throughout.
Proposal Component: Breakdown of Responsibilities Among Staff to Collect, Analyze, and Disseminate the Information	20.0%	Includes little knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge is not evident.	Includes little knowledge about the topic with few supporting details and examples. Little subject knowledge is evident.	Includes knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples. Some subject knowledge is evident.	Includes essential knowledge about the topic with supporting details and examples.	Covers topic in-depth with extensive details and examples.
Analysis	10.0%	Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly.	Ignores or superficially evaluates the incident and draws unwarranted or fallacious conclusions. Lacks supportive evidence and details.	Surface level of evaluation of the incident is offered. Minimal support for all components is presented.	Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the incident. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.	Analyzes and evaluates incident from a critical perspective and draws warranted, judicious, nonfallacious conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.
Comprehension	20.0%	Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.	Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. HIM 650 Assignment: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution	Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or timeliness.	Content is comprehensive and accurate, and rationales are clearly stated. Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.	Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive; rationales are clearly stated.           Research is adequate, timely, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Research	10.0%	No outside sources were used to support the assignment.	Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.	Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and/or timeliness.	Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.	Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)	5.0%	Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of "primer prose" indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.	Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.	Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.	The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.	The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.	The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
Total Weightage	100%	HIM 650 Assignment: Risk Incidence Occurrence Solution