Differences in Quality of Healthcare Assignment

Differences in Quality of Healthcare Assignment

Differences in Quality of Healthcare Assignment

Week 5 Assignment 1 Discussion/Dq Differences in Quality of Healthcare -South University

Differences in Quality of Healthcare

A lower percentage of African Americans and Hispanics report being satisfied with the quality of their healthcare than Caucasians. In the light of this, answer the questions that follow:

• Discuss at least three factors influencing differences in the rates of satisfaction with quality of healthcare among African Americans and Hispanics.
• Explain how differences in the healthcare received by people contribute to disparities in health.
• Identify at least three strategies that can overcome these differences in care.

Justify your responses by citing at least two scholarly sources.

Support your responses with examples.

In addition, respond to the following questions:

• Explain why health indicators are an important tool in public health.
• What are the leading health indicators as identified by Healthy People 2020?
• Describe how organizations across the nation are addressing these priority health topics.

Differences in Quality of Healthcare Assignment

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Week 5 Assignment 1 Discussion/Dq Corrections -South University

Corrections

Throughout the course, you have been considering how the general community and the “will of the people” influence the criminal justice policy. You applied this concept to law enforcement and now will turn to corrections. As you have seen, elected officials are the primary connection between the populace and the government. By enacting laws, politicians translate the wishes of the voters into policy. For this discussion:

• Describe the laws passed in the 1990s that relate to corrections and sentencing. What are the three changes that had the effect of keeping offenders incarcerated for longer periods of time, and for more crimes?
• Analyze at least five effects these “get tough” policies have had. Are these negative effects are an acceptable price to pay for lower crime rates?
• Can these “get tough” policies work alongside rehabilitation efforts? Why or why not?