Contact us:
+1 (520) 226-8615
Email:
[email protected]
Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
Discussion: Political, Social, and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health
As an advanced practice nurse, you must remain current on health issues that commonly impact women such as birth control, abortion, family planning, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Many of these women’s health issues are heavily influenced by political, social, and sociocultural factors. These influences might not only affect a woman’s ability or desire to receive care, but also a provider’s ability or willingness to offer care. How might political, social, and sociocultural factors influence your personal perceptions of these women’s health issues?
KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOMIZED ACADEMIC PAPER
To prepare for Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question:
· Review this week’s media presentation, as well as Chapter 1 of the Schuiling and Likis text.
· Select and research one of the following women’s health issues: birth control, abortion, family planning, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in women, or another issue approved by the course Instructor.
· Consider the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on the women’s health issue you selected.
· Reflect on how the personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue.
By Day 3
Post an explanation of the women’s health issue you selected, including the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on this issue. Explain how personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question.
By Day 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected different issues than you did. Based on your personal and/or professional experiences, expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Discussion: Political, Social, and Sociocultural Influences on Women’s Health
As an advanced practice nurse, you must remain current on health issues that commonly impact women such as birth control, abortion, family planning, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Many of these women’s health issues are heavily influenced by political, social, and sociocultural factors. These influences might not only affect a woman’s ability or desire to receive care, but also a provider’s ability or willingness to offer care. How might political, social, and sociocultural factors influence your personal perceptions of these women’s health issues?
To prepare for Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question:
· Review this week’s media presentation, as well as Chapter 1 of the Schuiling and Likis text.
· Select and research one of the following women’s health issues: birth control, abortion, family planning, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in women, or another issue approved by the course Instructor.
· Consider the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on the women’s health issue you selected.
· Reflect on how the personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue.
By Day 3
Post an explanation of the women’s health issue you selected, including the impact of political, social, and sociocultural factors on this issue. Explain how personal perceptions of providers might influence their ability or willingness to care for women in relation to this issue.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.
By Day 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected different issues than you did. Based on your personal and/or professional experiences, expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
RUBRIC
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
ContentName: NURS_6551_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View List View Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback: Main Posting:
Writing Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback: Main Posting:
Timely and full participation Points:
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts main discussion by due date
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation
Feedback: First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Points:
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
responds to questions posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
Feedback: First Response:
Writing Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOMIZED ACADEMIC PAPER
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are cited
Feedback: First Response:
Timely and full participation Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts by due date
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
Feedback: Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Points:
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
Feedback: Second Response:
Writing Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in Standard Edited English
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are cited
Feedback: Second Response:
Timely and full participation Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
Posts by due date
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback: Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation
Feedback:
Show DescriptionsShow Feedback
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.–Levels of Achievement: Outstanding Performance 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Excellent Performance40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Competent Performance35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Proficient Performance31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Excellent Performance 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Competent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
Contains some APA formatting errors
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and styleFeedback:
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts main discussion by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
responds to questions posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Excellent Performance8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Competent Performance7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Proficient Performance6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depthFeedback: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOMIZED ACADEMIC PAPER
First Response:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Excellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Competent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
Response is written in Standard Edited English
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are citedFeedback:
First Response:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:
Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Excellent Performance8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Competent Performance7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Proficient Performance6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 6 (6%) NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Assignment
Response may not be on topic, lacks depthFeedback:
Second Response:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Excellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Competent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Assignment: NURS 6551 Week 1 Discussion Question
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in Standard Edited English
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are citedFeedback:
Second Response:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
Posts by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:
Total Points: 100