Assignment: Contraceptives Position Paper
Assignment: Contraceptives Position Paper
Instructions For this assignment, complete the following:
· Compose a position paper representing the con side of your new topic. (See the Con-Paper Template). The paper should include approximately 6 developed paragraphs:
· Introduction (with thesis statement)
· Context paragraph
· 3 body paragraphs (focusing on 3 cons)
· Conclusion
· Apply a formal tone appropriate for academic audiences, maintaining an objective 3rd person point of view – no 1st person (I, me, my, we, our, us, mine) or 2nd person (you, your). Avoid contractions, clichés, and slang terminology.
· Use the provided template to assist in formatting the title page and document.
· Incorporate at least 3 scholarly sources into the paper. Cite all sources in APA format, both parenthetically and on a reference page.
· Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Not every error will be flagged automatically in word-processing programs, and some that are flagged as errors are actually correct.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
· Length: 2-3 pages (not including the title or reference pages)
· 1-inch margins
· Double spaced
· 12-point Times New Roman font
· Title page
· References page (minimum of 3 academic articles)
Grading This activity will be graded using the Con-Position Paper Grading Rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 6
Rubric
Position Paper Grading Rubric – 125 pts (2)
| Position Paper Grading Rubric – 125 pts (2) |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength |
| 5.0 pts
Meets length requirement |
0.0 pts
Does not meet length requirement |
|
5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePoint Analysis |
| 30.0 pts
The central idea is developed and expanded with depth of critical thought. |
25.5 pts
The central idea is discernible and developed. |
22.5 pts
The central idea needs more development with points tying back to the thesis. |
18.0 pts
The central idea is not developed, and the analysis lacks critical thought. |
0.0 pts
No effort |
|
30.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport |
| 30.0 pts
The writing supports claims with several detailed and persuasive examples. |
25.5 pts
The writing supports claims with examples, but additional analysis or examples could strengthen the argument. |
22.5 pts
The writing supports claims with examples, but the examples are not well-developed or examined. Additional examples and analysis are needed to make the argument more persuasive. |
18.0 pts
The central idea is not well-supported by claims and/or examples. |
0.0 pts
No effort |
|
30.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization |
| 25.0 pts
Paper is clear and cohesive. Introduction and conclusion support the overall flow of the paper. |
21.25 pts
Paper is basically clear and well-organized with a minimum of non-related material present. |
18.75 pts
Paper has some issues with clarity, flow, and cohesion. Paper lacks organization. |
15.0 pts
Paper lacks organization and has difficulty staying on track. Central themes are difficult to identify. |
0.0 pts
No effort |
|
25.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Mechanics & Usage |
| 10.0 pts
The writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper. |
8.5 pts
The writing contains a few major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text. |
7.5 pts
The writing contains some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper. |
6.0 pts
The writing contains several major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper. |
0.0 pts
No effort |
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity & Flow |
| 10.0 pts
The writing contains strong word choice that clarifies ideas and masterful sentence variety aids with the flow of ideas. |
8.5 pts
The writing contains varied word choice and sentence structures that clarify ideas and aid with the flow of ideas. |
7.5 pts
The writing contains word choice and sentence structures that can be revised for better clarification of ideas and flow of ideas. |
6.0 pts
The writing contains wording and sentence structures that are awkward and/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas. |
0.0 pts
No effort |
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVoice |
| 5.0 pts
The writing maintains third-person point of view/objective voice throughout the entire text. |
4.25 pts
The writing maintains third-person point of view/objective voice throughout much of the text. |
3.75 pts
The writing has some deviation from third-person point of view/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing. |
3.0 pts
The writing deviates significantly from third-person point of view/objective voice that needs to be revised so as not to sound biased or patronizing. |
0.0 pts
No effort |
|
5.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format |
| 10.0 pts
All sources are properly integrated and cited in the text and references page demonstrating a mastery of integrating resources and APA format. |
8.5 pts
Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some minor errors may exist in integration and/or citation, but it does not interfere with understanding the source of the information. |
7.5 pts
Most sources are integrated and cited in the text and references page. Some errors may exist in integration and/or citation that need to be addressed to clarify the source of information. |
6.0 pts
Sources are not properly integrated/cited in the text/references page. Formatting contains several errors that suggest a lack of understanding of the integration of resources and APA format. |
0.0 pts
No effort |
|
10.0 pts |
| Total Points: 125.0 |
