Assignment: Committees in Healthcare Organizations

Assignment: Committees in Healthcare Organizations

Assignment: Committees in Healthcare Organizations

Select either Option A or Option B to respond to and indicate within your post which option you chose.
Option A: Identify what you believe are the top three challenges in setting up a hospital-based committee from a managerial perspective.  In a 250- to 300-word post, discuss your rationale and address the following questions:

1. Why are committees advantageous for health care organizations?
2. What are some of the steps that you as a manager, could take to overcome these challenges?
3. How would you address conflict and/or divisiveness within the committee or team?

Option B : Committees have been determined as a necessary component to health care organizations.  As a manager, you have been tasked to set up a committee with one of the hospital departments.  In doing so, consider the following questions:

1. How much influence should the committee have in the overall management structure?
2. How would you maintain authority without adopting an autocratic leadership style?
   of the paper is clear.

   ORDER Assignment: Committees in Healthcare Organizations

   5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

   A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

   4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

   Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

   3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

   Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

   0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

   No purpose statement was provided.

   Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

   9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

   Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

   8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

   Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

   7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

   Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

   0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

   Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

   Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.

   18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

   Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

   16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

   Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

   14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

   Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

   0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

   Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.

   Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

   18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

   Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

   16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

   Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

   14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

   Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

   0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

   Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

   Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

   5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

   Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

   4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

   Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

   3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

   Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

   0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

   Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.

   Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

   5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

   Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

   4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

   Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

   3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

   Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

   0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

   Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

   Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

   5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

   Uses correct APA format with no errors.

   4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

   Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

   3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

   Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Assignment: Committees in Healthcare Organizations.