Week 2 Reflective Essay: Challenging Practice Situation

Week 2 Reflective Essay: Challenging Practice Situation

Week 2 Reflective Essay: Challenging Practice Situation

Week 2: Reflective Essay Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Submit Assignment

• Due Sep 15 by 11:59pm

 

• Points 100

 

• Submitting a file upload

The Reflective Essay Guidelines with Scoring Rubric is due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (MT) at the end of Week 2. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment are listed below.

Week 2: Reflective Essay Guidelines and Scoring Rubric (Links to an external site.)

Purpose

Nursing knowledge is classified in a variety of ways, one of which is Carper’s Patterns of Knowing (Carper, 1978). Carper’s framework offers a lens through which the nurse can reflect upon insights acquired through empirical, ethical, personal, and aesthetic knowledge (Carper, 1978). Through intentional reflection using Carper’s Patterns of Knowing, nurses can process experiential learning and knowledge acquired through practice. The purpose of this assignment is to reflect upon a specific practice situation and better understand the professional knowledge and insights obtained through that experience.

Course Outcomes

Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes:

• Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of theory to nursing practice. (CO #1)
• Examine broad theoretical concepts as foundational to advanced nursing practice roles. (CO #3)

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 100 points.

Due Date

Submit your file by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 2.

Students are given the opportunity to request an extension on assignments for emergent situations. Supporting documentation must be submitted to the assigned faculty. If the student’s request is not approved, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

• Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction
• Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction
• Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction

If the student’s request is approved, the student will be informed of the revised due date. Should the student fail to meet the revised due date, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

• Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction
• Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction
• Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Week 2 Reflective Essay: Challenging Practice Situation

Requirements

Criteria for Content

1. Think of a surprising or challenging practice situation in which you felt underprepared, unprepared, or uncomfortable.
2. Select an important nursing issue/topic that was inherent to the identified situation.
3. As a method of refection, use Carper’s Patterns of Knowing to analyze the situation. In a two- to three-page paper address the following:
4. Briefly explain the situation
5. Identify the nursing issue inherent in the identified situation
6. What do you think was the underlying reason for the situation? (Esthetics)
7. What were your thoughts and feeling in the situation? (Personal)
8. What was one personal belief that impacted your actions? (Ethics)
9. What evidence in nursing literature supports the nursing importance of the identified issue? (Empirical)
10. What new insights did you gain through this reflective practice opportunity?

Week 2 Reflective Essay: Challenging Practice Situation

Preparing the paper

Submission Requirements

1. Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written component of this assessment.
2. Length:
3. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least two but no more than three pages.
4. A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature sources must be used.
5. Submission: Submit your file to the Canvas course site by the due date/time indicated.

 

Best Practices in Preparing the Reflective Essay

The following are best practices in preparing this reflective essay.

1. Review directions thoroughly.
2. Follow assignment requirements.
3. Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.
4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
5. Because the paper is a reflective essay, first person is acceptable for this assignment.
6. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
7. Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
8. A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature sources must be used.
9. Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.

 

Rubric

NR501: Week 2 Reflective Essay

Criteria         Ratings        Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of the Situation      10.0 pts

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Synopsis of the practice situation • Discussion of how the practice situation created a feeling of being underprepared, unprepared, or uncomfortable         9.0 pts

Presentation of information is superficial and includes all of the following elements: • Synopsis of the practice situation • Discussion of how the practice situation created a feeling of being underprepared, unprepared, or uncomfortable       8.0 pts

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Synopsis of the practice situation • Discussion of how the practice situation created a feeling of being underprepared, unprepared, or uncomfortable    6.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Synopsis of the practice situation • Discussion of how the practice situation created a feeling of being underprepared, unprepared, or uncomfortable          0.0 pts

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Synopsis of the practice situation • Discussion of how the practice situation created a feeling of being underprepared, unprepared, or uncomfortable

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing Issue or Concern Inherent to the Situation   15.0 pts

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all the following elements: • Identification of the specific nursing issue or concern which was present in this situation • Discussion of why the specific issue or concern is noteworthy • Support from the literature to validate the specific issue or concern   13.0 pts

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all the following elements: • Identification of the specific nursing issue or concern which was present in this situation • Discussion of why the specific issue or concern is noteworthy • Support from the literature to validate the specific issue or concern   12.0 pts

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all the following elements: • Identification of the specific nursing issue or concern which was present in this situation • Discussion of why the specific issue or concern is noteworthy • Support from the literature to validate the specific issue or concern   9.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing: • Identification of the specific nursing issue or concern which was present in this situation • Discussion of why the specific issue or concern is noteworthy • Support from the literature to validate the specific issue or concern   0.0 pts

Presentation of information in two or more following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing: • Identification of the specific nursing issue or concern which was present in this situation • Discussion of why the specific issue or concern is noteworthy • Support from the literature to validate the specific issue or concern

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection upon the Situation using Carper’s Patterns of Knowing         45.0 pts

Week 2 Reflective Essay: Challenging Practice Situation

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • What do you think was the underlying reason for the situation? (Esthetics) • What were your thoughts and feeling in the situation? (Personal) • What was one personal belief that impacted your actions? (Ethics) • What evidence in nursing literature supports the nursing importance of the identified issue? (Empirical) • Support from the literature to validate the empirical pattern of knowing       40.0 pts

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • What do you think was the underlying reason for the situation? (Esthetics) • What were your thoughts and feeling in the situation? (Personal) • What was one personal belief that impacted your actions? (Ethics) • What evidence in nursing literature supports the nursing importance of the identified issue? (Empirical) • Support from the literature to validate the empirical pattern of knowing       36.0 pts

Week 2 Reflective Essay: Challenging Practice Situation

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • What do you think was the underlying reason for the situation? (Esthetics) • What were your thoughts and feeling in the situation? (Personal) • What was one personal belief that impacted your actions? (Ethics) • What evidence in nursing literature supports the nursing importance of the identified issue? (Empirical) • Support from the literature to validate the empirical pattern of knowing       17.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • What do you think was the underlying reason for the situation? (Esthetics) • What were your thoughts and feeling in the situation? (Personal) • What was one personal belief that impacted your actions? (Ethics) • What evidence in nursing literature supports the nursing importance of the identified issue? (Empirical) • Support from the literature to validate the empirical pattern of knowing  0.0 pts

Presentation of information in two of more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • What do you think was the underlying reason for the situation? (Esthetics) • What were your thoughts and feeling in the situation? (Personal) • What was one personal belief that impacted your actions? (Ethics) • What evidence in nursing literature supports the nursing importance of the identified issue? (Empirical) • Support from the literature to validate the empirical pattern of knowing

45.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of Reflection          20.0 pts

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Include a minimum of two new insights gained through the situation you experienced • Discuss how intentional reflective practice can add to professional knowledge in your future advanced practice nursing role   18.0 pts

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: • Include a minimum of two new insights gained through the situation you experienced • Discuss how intentional reflective practice can add to professional knowledge in your future advanced practice nursing role        16.0 pts

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Include a minimum of two new insights gained through the situation you experienced • Discuss how intentional reflective practice can add to professional knowledge in your future advanced practice nursing role        8.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Include a minimum of two new insights gained through the situation you experienced • Discuss how intentional reflective practice can add to professional knowledge in your future advanced practice nursing role  0.0 pts

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Include a minimum of two new insights gained through the situation you experienced • Discuss how intentional reflective practice can add to professional knowledge in your future advanced practice nursing role.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

          20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format        5.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 0 to 1 APA error is present       4.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 2–3 APA errors are present       3.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 4–5 APA errors are present       2.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 6–7 APA errors are present       0.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 8 or greater APA errors are present

5.0 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics        5.0 pts

1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.          4.0 pts

3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.          3.0 pts

5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.          2.0 pts

7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.          0.0 pts

9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. For this assignment, first person may be used.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Page Length Note: Students are to use at least two (2) scholarly references. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least two but no more than three pages.    0.0 pts

3 point deduction if student does not meet these requirements     0.0 pts

No deductions if student meets these requirements