Case Report: Application of Theory Week 7

Case Report: Application of Theory Week 7

Case Report: Application of Theory Week 7

General Guidelines:In this assignment, learners are required to write a case report addressing the personal knowledge and skills gained in this course and potentially solving an identified practice problem.

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Construct a 2,500-3,000 word (approximately 10-12 pages) case report that includes a problem or situation consistent with a DNP area of practice.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Requirements:

1. Use a minimum of any two theories discussed in the course to develop the case report.
2. Apply one or more theories to describe understanding of the problem or situation of focus.
3. Apply one or more theories to the recommended intervention or solution being proposed.
4. Develop the case report across the entire scenario from the identified clinical or health care problem through proposing an intervention, implementation, and evaluation using an appropriate research instrument.
5. Describe the evaluation of the selected research instrument in the case report.
6. Lastly, explain in full the tenets, rationale for selection (empirical evidence), and clear application using the language of the theory within the case report.

In addition, your case report must include the following:

1. Introduction with a problem statement.
2. Brief literature review.
3. Description of the case/situation/conditions explained from a theoretical perspective.
4. Discussion that includes a detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings.
5. Summary of the case.
6. Proposed solutions to remedy gaps, inefficiencies, or other issues from a theoretical approach.
7. Identification of a research instrument to evaluate the proposed solution along with a description of how the instrument could be evaluated.

Portfolio Practice Hours:

It may be possible to earn Portfolio Practice hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-815

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

Rubric

Attempt Start Date: 15-Aug-2019 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date: 21-Aug-2019 at 11:59:59 PM

Maximum Points: 300.0

Case Report: Application of Theory Week 7

Rubric:

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
DNP-815	DNP-815-O501	Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper	150.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Personal Philosophy of Nursing	70.0%
Discussion of Central Belief About the Individual Person	10.0%	A discussion of central belief about the individual person is not present.	A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete.	A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present, but at a perfunctory level.	A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Discussion of How Personal Worldview Influences Approach to Patients	10.0%	A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is not present.	A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete.	A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present, but at a perfunctory level.	A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Discussion of What Constitutes the Environment	10.0%	A discussion of what constitutes the environment is not present.	A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete.	A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present, but at a perfunctory level.	A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Discussion of How the Individual Person and the Environment Interact	10.0%	A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is not present. Case Report: Application of Theory Week 7	A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete.	A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present, but at a perfunctory level.	A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present and is convincing and thorough. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present and is convincing and thorough. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Discussion of View of What Constitutes Health	10.0%	A discussion of the view of what constitutes as health is not present.	A discussion of the view of what constitutes as health is  present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete.	A discussion of the view of what constitutes as health is present, but at a perfunctory level.	A discussion of the view of what constitutes as health is present and is convincing and thorough. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	A discussion of the view of what constitutes as health is present and is convincing and thorough. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Discussion of How Illness Relates to Health	10.0%	A discussion of how illness relates to health is not present.	A discussion of how illness relates to health is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete.	A discussion of how illness relates to health is present, but at a perfunctory level.	A discussion of how illness relates to health is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	A discussion of how illness relates to health is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Discussion of the Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing	10.0%	A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is not present.	A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present, but insufficient in detail or incomplete.	A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present, but at a perfunctory level. Case Report: Application of Theory Week 7	A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	No reference page is included. No citations are used. Case Report: Application of Theory Week 7	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%