Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review – formalize your PICOT

Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review – formalize your PICOT

Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review – formalize your PICOT

Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review

In Part A, you described the population and quality initiative related to your PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) statement. In this assignment, you will formalize your PICOT and research process.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER – Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review – formalize your PICOT

Use the GCU Library to perform a search for peer-reviewed research articles. Find five peer-reviewed primary source translational research articles.

In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, synthesize the research into a literature review. The literature review should provide an overview for the reader that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT. Include the following:

1. Introduction: Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing.
2. Methods: Describe the criteria you used in choosing your articles
3. Synthesize the Literature: Part A: Discuss the main components of each article (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how this supports your PICOT; Part B: Compare and contrast the articles: Discuss limitations, controversies, and similarities/differences of the studies.
4. Areas of Further Study: Analyze the evidence presented in your articles to identify what is known, unknown, and requires further study.

You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review – formalize your PICOT

Rubric

Course Code	Class Code
NUR-550	NUR-550-O101	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.0
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-551	NUR-550-O102	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.1	Satisfactory (88.00%)	Good (92.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-552	NUR-550-O103	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.2	An introduction is present.	An introduction is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive introduction is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-553	NUR-550-O104	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.3	A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is present.	A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-554	NUR-550-O105	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.4	A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is present.	A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-555	NUR-550-O106	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.5	A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is present.	A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-556	NUR-550-O107	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.6	An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is present.	An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-557	NUR-550-O108	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.7	Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.	Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.	Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-558	NUR-550-O109	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.8
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-559	NUR-550-O110	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.9	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-560	NUR-550-O111	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.10	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-561	NUR-550-O112	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.11	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-562	NUR-550-O113	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.12
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-563	NUR-550-O114	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.13	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-564	NUR-550-O115	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.14	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Course Code	Class Code
NUR-565	NUR-550-O116	Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review	250.15