Contact us:
+1 (520) 226-8615
Email:
[email protected]
HLTH 3105 WK5-Performance Evaluation
HLTH 3105 WK5-Performance Evaluation for individual and team Sample
Part 1: Individual Performance Evaluation
| Student Name | Team Discussions (3 possible points) |
Team Role (3 possible points) |
Team Interaction (3 possible points) |
Total (9 possible points) |
| X | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Y | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
Scoring Guidelines
TEAM DISCUSSIONS:
| Points: 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Discussion with team members is timely, relevant, and consistently contributes to the quality of interactions; offers valuable resources, applicable support, rich and relevant examples; and is respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or an opposing viewpoint. | Discussion with team members is timely and contributes to the quality of interactions.
Resources, support, and examples are offered frequently. All remarks are respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or an opposing viewpoint. |
Discussion with team members contributes minimally to the quality of interactions; offers few resources, support, or examples; all remarks are respectful. | Rarely participates.
When participates in discussions, has nothing of substance or quality to offer. Some remarks are disrespectful. |
HLTH 3105 WK5-Performance Evaluation
TEAM ROLE:
| Points: 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Team role is fulfilled in an exceptional manner.
Agreed-upon work is consistently completed and submitted in a timely manner, according to team plan for collaboration. All work contributes substantively to the completion of each project section. |
Team role is fulfilled.
Agreed-upon work is generally completed and submitted in a timely manner, according to team plan for collaboration. Most, but not all, of work contributes to completion of each project section.
|
Team role is not sufficiently fulfilled.
Agreed-upon work is partially completed. Inconsistent consideration for due dates and the team collaboration plan. |
Does not fulfill team role.
Consistently fails to submit work in a timely manner or misses agreed-upon deadlines. Submitted work is incomplete or does not contribute to completion of project. |
ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER WITH ALL INSTRUCTIONS FOLLOWED
TEAM INTERACTION:
| Points: 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Consistently polite and respectful of others; recognizes, considers, and values contributions and ideas of other team members.
Often asks appropriate and insightful questions to gain greater understanding or clarity. All contributions provide specific details to help move the discussion or interaction forward. |
Interaction with team members demonstrates consideration and adequate response to the contributions of others.
Sometimes asks appropriate and insightful questions to gain greater understanding or clarity. Most contributions provide specific details to help move the discussion or interaction forward. |
Interaction with team members considers and responds to the contributions of others.
Rarely poses questions that produce greater understanding or clarity.
Contributions are general in nature, without moving the discussion or interaction forward. |
Interactions with team members do not consider or respond to the contributions of others.
Interactions do not move the discussion forward to completion of the project plan. Never poses appropriate questions to gain greater understanding or clarity. |
HLTH 3105 WK5-Performance Evaluation
Part 2: Team Performance Evaluation
For each of the tasks identified below, provide an honest evaluation of your team’s overall performance using the rating scale provided. Your grade will not be affected by your Team Performance Evaluation.
Performance rating key
1 – Poor
2 – Fair
3 – Good
4 – Excellent
.
| Task | Rating |
| Effective leadership | 3 |
| Team clearly defined its goals and identified specific steps for achieving them | 4 |
| Regular and frequent team self-evaluation | 3 |
| Regularly scheduled team meetings | 2 |
| Productive and efficient meetings with clear identification of tasks | 2 |
| Clear delineation of individual responsibilities | 4 |
| Managed conflict effectively | 4 |
| Encouraged frank and open exchange of ideas | 4 |
| Quality of team’s PowerPoint presentation | 4 |