Contact us:
+1 (520) 226-8615
Email:
[email protected]
PSY 622 Case of Tarasoff v Regents
PSY 622 Case of Tarasoff v Regents Details:
In 750-1,000 words, consider the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California to answer the following:
1- Discuss why the case is important to mental health clinicians.
2- Describe the violence risk assessment instruments a clinician might use to meet the requirements provided for in Tarasoff.
3- Discuss if a clinician should be held civilly liable for violent behavior of an inmate the clinician assessed.
Provide three to five peer reviewed resources to support your explanations.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. Written from scratch.
Tags: PSY 622 Grand Canyon Assignment Case of Tarasoff v. Regents, PSY622 GrandCanyonAssignmentCaseofTarasoffv.Regents, PSY 622 Grand Canyon Assignment, PSY622GrandAssignment, PSY 622 GCU Assignment, PSY622GCUAssignment, PSY 622 Assignment, PSY622Assignment, PSY 622 Grand Canyon Assignment Case of Tarasoff v. Regents, PSY622GrandCanyonAssignmentCaseofTarasoffv.Regents,PSY 622 Grand Canyon Discussion, PSY622GrandDiscussion, PSY 622 GCU DQ, PSY622GCUDQ, PSY 622 DQ, PSY622DQ, PSY 622 Grand Canyon Discussion, PSY622GrandDiscussion, PSY 622 GCU DQ,PSY622GCUDQ, PSY 622 DQ, PSY622DQ
PSY 622 Case of Tarasoff v. Regents
End of Program Outcomes Evidence Chart
| MSN Graduate Characteristics | Individual Student Learning Outcomes (ISLOs) | Course #; Learner Assessments (Evidence according to alignment of learner outcomes from Syllabus chart) | Student Outcome:
Service(Community/ Professional) |
Student Outcome:
Scholar-Practitioner (Scholarship/ Practice) |
Student Outcome: |
| LEADERS/CHANGE AGENTS | LO1—Synthesize organizational/systems leadership for cost-effective specialist nursing practice that contributes to high-quality healthcare delivery, advancement of the nursing profession, and social change. | PSY 622 Case of Tarasoff v Regents | |||
| SCHOLAR-/EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTITIONERS | LO2—Critique evidence-based literature drawing from diverse theoretical perspectives and pertinent research to guide decision making that demonstrates best practices for specialist nursing practice in a global society. | ||||
| PROFESSIONALS/ COLLABORATORS | LO3—Integratively assess, diagnose, plan, implement, and evaluate cost-effective healthcare strategies that reduce health disparities by patient/population advocacy for access to specialist nursing care. | PSY 622 Case of Tarasoff v Regents | |||
| EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATORS | LO4—Demonstrate the ability to effectively communicate using audience-specific oral, written, and information technology for professional delivery of specialist nursing care. | ||||
| EDUCATORS/
CONSULTANTS |
LO5—Evaluate health needs of diverse populations for necessary teaching/coaching functions based on specialist nursing knowledge to restore/promote health and prevent illness/injury. | PSY 622 Case of Tarasoff v Regents | |||
| LIFELONG LEARNERS | LO6—Exhibit ongoing commitment to professional development and value of nursing theories/ethical principles (altruism, autonomy, human dignity, integrity, social justice) in accordance with ethically responsible, legally accountable specialist nursing practice. | ||||
| HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS | LO7—Implement specialist nursing roles to promote quality improvement of patient-centered care in accordance with professional practice standards that transform health outcomes for diverse populations. |