Contact us:
+1 (520) 226-8615
Email:
[email protected]
NR511_Peer_Review_Guidelines and Rubric
A student peer review is a process in which students constructively evaluate the work of another student’s work which promotes mutual learning. Feedback provided from a peer can help the learner master the concepts of an assignment. At the same time, the peer who provides the feedback on a student assignment learns to critically analyze the learner’s work.
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
1) Evaluate a current clinical practice guideline (CPG) in primary care. (CO3)
2) Provide critical and constructive feedback on a peer’s assignment. (CO 3)
Due Date: Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 7
Total Points Possible: 50
1. The instructor will provide each student with the name of a peer whose assignment must be reviewed prior to Week 7.
2. The student will read the peer’s assigned CPG (which should be posted with every peer presentation).
3. Using the Peer Review Rubric provided, students will critically evaluate their assigned peer’s PowerPoint presentation.
4. Peer evaluations are due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. One (1) copy must be uploaded to the course. The second (2nd) copy should be sent via the course conversation inbox to the peer whose work was reviewed.
In this activity you are “grading” your peer’s presentation with the rubric that your instructor uses. Be mindful to follow any additional directions that are required as noted in the peer reviewer form.
• The written peer review is to be completed on the corresponding Peer Review template.
• Add your name and the name of the presenter that you are reviewing in the appropriate section.
• Watch your assigned peer’s presentation.
• Provide a “grade” for your peer by highlighting the box that you feel most represents the appropriate grade for each criteria.
• Provide constructive feedback in the Peer Reviewer Comments section.
• Discuss how the CPG that you reviewed can be applied to your clinical practice as stated in the rubric. You can include your response at the bottom of the Peer Reviewer Template or after your comments in the Application in Clinical box of the same form.
• Peer evaluations are due by Sunday 11:59pm MT of Week 7.
• One (1) copy must be uploaded to the Peer Review assignment box.
• One (1) copy should be emailed to the peer whose work was reviewed.
• Late penalties will be applied as per the late penalty guidelines specified in the course syllabus.
NR511_Peer_Review_Guidelines and Rubric
Category Points % Description
Peer review 20 40% The student “grades” a peer’s presentation based on the same rubric that the instructor uses for the assignment and thoughtfully provides constructive feedback.
Application to Practice 20 40% The student discusses how the information learned in the peer presentation can be applied in their clinical practice rotation.
Format 10 20% The peer evaluation is composed on the Peer Evaluation Template with clear and understandable comments
Total 50 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
Criterion
Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance Meets
Satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement
Poor or failing level of performance Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance
Content
Possible Points = 40 Points
Peer Review
The student evaluates a peer’s presentation using the rubric for the assignment and provides thoughtful constructive feedback in all five areas.
*Constructive feedback implies that the student does not just state vague or general comments such as “well done” or “I agree”. 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 Points
Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form
AND
Student provides constructive feedback to the peer in each of the 5 areas.
Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form
BUT
The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in 1 of the 5 areas. Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form
BUT
The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in 2-3 areas. Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form
BUT
The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in 4 areas. Student did not provide a “grade” in every area of the rubric form
OR
The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in all 5 areas
OR
The student does not complete this section
Application to Practice
The student analyzes the CPG and identifies three specific examples that can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice. This analysis is clearly stated as an addendum at the bottom of the template. 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 Points
Student identifies three specific examples of how the CPG can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice
AND
The nature of the student’s response is meaningful and relative to the topic Student identifies two specific examples of how the CPG can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice
AND
The nature of the student’s response is meaningful and relative to the topic Student identifies one specific examples of how the CPG can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice
AND
The nature of the student’s response is meaningful and relative to the topic Student identifies one or more examples
BUT
The nature of the response is vague or irrelevant to the topic Student provides a response which contains no specific examples
OR
The student does not complete this section
Content Subtotal _____of 40 points
NR511_Peer_Review_Guidelines and Rubric
Format
Possible Points = 10
Format
Peer evaluation is written on the peer evaluation template. The evaluation is easy to understand with correct grammar, syntax, or spelling. 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points
The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment
AND
The evaluation is easy to understand with very few (0-1) grammatical, syntax, or spelling errors The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment
AND
The evaluation is easy to understand with a few (2-3) grammatical, syntax or spelling errors
The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment
AND
The evaluation is easy to understand with many (4-5) grammatical, syntax or spelling errors
The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment
AND
The evaluation is difficult to understand with very many (6-9) grammatical, syntax or spelling errors
The peer evaluation template is not used
OR
The evaluation is difficult to understand with >10 grammatical, syntax, or spelling errors
OR
The student does not complete this section.
Format Subtotal _____of 10 points
Total Points _____of 50 points
• Late penalties will be applied as per the late penalty guidelines specified in the course syllabus
NR511_Peer_Review_Guidelines and Rubric
NR 511 Assignment Summary
Probably one of the most asked question at the beginning of this class is logging MyEvaluations and where the MyEvaluations is.
Log in to https://portal.chamberlain.edu/login.
On the left column, you will see “Resources”
Then “My degree and course”
Then, under the “Practicum/Clinical Logging tool – MyEvaluations”
Then you will be directed to another website that would like this.
Finally, you are at the logging website.
Why did they make it so complicated? lol. Tell me about it… -_-
You are ok to log 1 hour/pt in NR511 and gradually decrease the time/pt. I had a few pt with slightly more than an hour due to the pt’s complexity. As long as your documentation supports, then you can log more than an hour. For some instructors, they get very picky and will ask you to start decreasing time/pt sometime around Week 5 or so. Yes, you are allowed to log 1 hr/pt but to some instructors, such rules do not apply to them. Welcome to CU. -_-
Toward the end of the practicum, I started to log some 50 min/pt for simple cold-like symptoms and 30 min/pt for sports physicals. As long as your time is reasonable, you shouldn’t have a problem.
When you go to the clinic, you will need this stuff for you to fill in the logs easily and get through the day.
Once you get used to it, you won’t need the clinical log template.
Below is one of my sample logs. I have not had any rejection from all of the clinical evaluations by all instructors. I once had an opinion of being too detailed by an instructor but she was ok with that much of detail. Of course, the below content goes to the “comment” section of MyEval and all the selecting parts are also completed.
38LW
CPT: 99214
Chief Complaint(s): 1. Follow up on ER visit for right arm numbness and loss of vision, referral to neurologist. 2. Discuss checking thyroid and iron for fatigue and dizziness x few months, hx of low iron.
Pt denies over the past 2 weeks of feeling down, depressed or having little interest or pleasure in doing things. (per PHQ-2 screening tool)History of Present Illness: 1. Dizziness
Pt was recently seen in ED due to acute onset right arm numbness and “floaters”/ loss of vision bilaterally. Pt had a HR of 49 and otherwise Head CT, EKG, aPTT, CMP, CBC were WNL. Pt admits to increased stress and anxiety around ED visit. Pt is still having dizziness and lightheadedness upon standing for 5 days. All other presenting symptoms in including paresthesia, anxiety, and change in vision have not returned since 1 episode leading to ED visit. Of note, pt is very active in exercise and sport. Pt confirms quality hydration status. Denies palpitations, SOB.Allergies: No Known Allergies Family History: Brother 1: Thyroid Disease Father: Hypertension, Hypothyroidism Paternal Grandfather: Thyroid Disease Social History: Alcohol: 1 drinks/week Exercise: Daily Caffeine: Coffee 1x/day Smoking: Never smoker Review of Systems: General Fatigue. Denies fever, chills, night sweats Skin Denies skin changes; itching; rashes; sores Head Denies trauma; headache, nausea, vomiting, visual changes Cardiac Denies chest pain, palpitations, hypertension, dyspnea on exertion, edema Respiratory Denies shortness of breath, wheeze, cough, sputum Neurologic Dizziness upon standing. Denies headaches, loss of sensation, numbness, tingling, tremors, weakness/paralysis, fainting/blackouts, seizures Hematologic Denies anemia Endocrine Denies excessive sweating, polyuria, polydipsia
OBJECTIVE Vitals: Systolic: On examination – Systolic BP reading: 118 Diastolic: On examination – Diastolic blood pressure reading: 80
T: 97.8 F. Pulse: 64 / min Resp: 16 / min BP: 118 / 80 mmHg WT: 150 lbs HT: 5’10” BMI: 21.52
Exams: General Alert and oriented, In no acute distress, well developed, well nourished Head/Face NC/AT Eyes PERRLA, EOMI, No injection or icterus Resp CTA bilaterally, no wheezes, rhonchi, or rales Cardio RRR, normal S1, S2, no murmurs, rubs, or gallops (S3, S4) Neuro Motor/Sensation grossly normal, Non-focal Musculo No muscle atrophy or weakness, No focal areas of tenderness Extremities No clubbing, cyanosis, or edema Skin Warm, dry, no rashes Psych Alert and cooperative, Normal affect, Thoughts appear congruent and appropriateASSESSMENT Assessment for this encounter: Unspecified visual loss(H54.7) Paresthesia of skin(R20.2) Dizziness and giddiness(R42) Other fatigue(R53.83)
1. Re-occuring Dizziness/ Recent ED visit
–Pt referred to Cardiology for further assessment
–Pt referred to Neurology for paresthesias, vision loss in absence of cause of CVA workup
–LABS TSH, T4, T3 due to family history
–Will call patient with abnormal lab results
–Pt educated on maintaining adequate fluid intake
–ED precautions reviewed with patient
–RTC as needed
Week 1 exam – Content of the exam is not hard at all but the way the questions worded are very confusing! Make sure that you know every bit of words from the video lectures. Questions are very nitpicking!
VICE Call – Phone call assignment. Around week 3, you should be getting an email from your professor for arranging time/date for the VICE call. The call will last less than 30 minutes (mine lasted about 25 minutes including chit-chatting for ice breaker) and you have 2nd chance to call if you miss the 1st scheduled date/time.
Depending on your professor, some professor would let you pick your patient or professor will pick a patient from the logged patients from “My Evaluation”.
You are basically going to do SNAPPS. In my case, I was allowed to pick a patient prior to the call. (If you get to pick your own pt, make sure that you pick easy pt.) I reviewed the patient’s report prior to the call and practiced SNAPPS. I pre-typed what I wanted to present on a screen and went through one by one. At the time of scheduled date/time, you will call you professor that professor provided you and do the SNAPPS. Only one part that was different from me was, I did the P (Probe) part at the end. The phone on the professor’s side was left mute while I was presenting until I went down the list of SNAPS (Probe “P” was done after all other parts were done.)
Summary – Make sure to present the chief complaint with age and gender.
Narrow differential – Get 3 differential with reasoning for each.
Analyze differential – Explain why you think the main diagnosis is and why other diagnoses are not.
Plan management – Start from conservative measure to invasive.
Self-learning – This part is not very important but you need to be ready with some legitimate questions. This part somewhat overlaps with the second “P” (Probe). I asked something like “how would I really know which dx to treat in the real situation?”, “how can I distinguish very small differences between two different compelling dx?”, and etc.
Week 3/6 Case study – There are 2 parts for this assignment. My tip of advice on these case study assignments is to be very detailed. Follow the rubrics, word for word and nail every bit of rubric. I think I was blessed with the professor. I did get 50/50 for both Week 3 case study postings. I did follow exactly what the rubric stated. However, I have heard that many people didn’t get full credit not because they missed contents but not doing the APA references. I have seen people getting their points off down to 42 due to references. Yes, really. Make sure that you follow exactly how APA should be.
Yes, you will need to put references in APA format.
Your initial post has to be done by Tuesday of the week and you need to reply to 1x to peer and at least 1x to your instructor if he/she asks any question.
Part 2 Discussion
Your initial post has to be done by Tuesday of the week and you need to reply to 1x to peer and at least 1x to your instructor if he/she asks any question.
Week 4 – Midterm – Hum. I don’t want to scare you but I want you to be ready for this. It’s poorly written exam with typos and confusing wordings. I don’t think I ever had an exam with that many NOT questions (Which one of these are NOT the right answer). You know, until this exam, I never knew these NOT questions were more difficult than the other way around. I felt as if those NOT questions were semi-SATA (select all that apply) questions. Unless you know all other 3 right answers, you cannot get them right! Not to mention these questions were also nitpicking just like Week 1 exam. Did the exams follow the study guide? Well, I would have to say yes but the study guide is nothing but huge headlines of topics. No more, no less. I also did see some questions that were not part of the coverage. Yes, it does cover the 1st-week exam contents. At least those were less annoying than the actual 1st exam questions. There were a few true/false questions too.
How should you study? Just like the week 1 exam, know EVERYTHING in the lecture. There were some questions that were not covered by the lecture and came out. You may have to fight for that. Did questions come out from the Youtube video lectures? You bet! I heavily focused on the lecture scripts. If you have leftover time, then go after the textbook. I also used Hollier review book and Hollier Clinical Guidelines. Some of the lecture contents are almost exactly the same as the Hollier review book. Um… makes me wonder… =p
SNAPP assignment – This assignment is done over the phone just like the YouTube video that was in the Week 1 module (SNAPPS #1, #2). Your instructor will send you an email regarding the schedule of time. You will get to pick on what time/date you would like to do the presentation. The email will also have instructions. Your instructor will either let you pick your patient from the patients that you logged to the MyEvaluations or your instructor will pick for you. Some nicer instructors will let you pick ahead of time so that you are prepared. Some “not so good” instructors will pick just before the call.
During the call (lasts about 15~20 mins), you are going to present a patient that you saw during your clinic by using SNAPP. I prepared the presentation by writing out SNAPP form on Word program and almost literally read it (make sure to write as if you are just talking by mixing “and…, um…”). I did put the Probe part in the last part of the presentation and make sure to have a few legit questions.
I heard that some instructors asked very detailed questions. So be prepared with diagnosis, treatment plans and so on.
Tip for this assignment is to have MyEvaluations is done in detail. I literally have entire chart copy-pasted on the MyEvaluations without sensitive personal information.
Templates you will need.
CPG (Clinical Practice Guideline) – This assignment can be very confusing. Again, follow the rubric in detail. By Week 4, you should have received email from your instructor with a topic and an article. If the topic that you received is something that you didn’t get to treat at the practicum, let your instructor know so that you can change your topic. In my case, I initially got the hyperlipidemia. I did have HTN pt but no one really comes to a clinic just for the hyperlipidemia. So, I changed the topic to something else. There are several parts to this assignment.
What is the use of the article that the instructor gave it to you? It supposed to be the treatment guideline for the diagnosis that you were assigned. The article should have several statements regarding the treatment. You will be picking up to 5 of them and present them. Some may have less than 5 statements. Make sure to find that the article that was given to you is most updated by searching google.
Final exam – Yes, you made it! Probably you want to know how to study for the final. Well, simple answer, know everything. I focused on the lecture scripts (I stopped watching the videos. Many of the just read straight off of the ppt without any explanation. No point of watching.) I also used Hollier review book and Hollier Clinical Guidelines.
Reflection – I don’t know what to say about this one. Just … all the way. -_-
Do not lose any points from assignments. Every point will be very crucial for you to keep the grade as high as you can. Midterm and final exam questions are quite random. Some of them are very detailed and some are stupidly easy. Any final exam is never designed to raise grade up! You need to keep your grade up as high as you can so that even if you fail your final exam, you can still pass the class. I was lucky enough to have all assignments with full credit and I needed no more than 50 points on the finals for me to pass the class. NR511_Peer_Review_Guidelines and Rubric