Reflective Practice: Pants on Fire

Reflective Practice: Pants on Fire

Read the section titled “Reflective Practice: Pants on Fire” from chapter “Health Policy, Politics, and Professional Ethics” and address the questions below:

•How do you judge Palin’s quote? [“And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s death panel so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their level of productivity in society, whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.]

Effective strategy to oppose Democrats’ plans for health care reform or unethical scaremongering?

•Reflect on what informs your judgment: commitment to advance care planning, analysis of facts, and/or political party loyalties?

•Is it right for nurses to endorse health reform legislation even if the legislation is not perfect? Does this apply to the recently failed American Health Care Act?

Reflective Practice: Pants on Fire

Assignment Details

For this Assignment, you are going to write a paper explaining how you developed your theory through the four stages (theorizing, syntax, theory testing, and evaluation). Your paper must be 3 to 5 pages, not including the title and reference pages.

To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.

Assignment Requirements

Before finalizing your work, you should:

• Minimum requirement of at least 5 sources of support
• be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
• consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and
• utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.

All papers are to be typed, in manuscript format. APA–minus 2 points if not done
Late- minus 1 point per day
15 pages-minus 1 point for each page under 15 pages
Approximately 20% of your paper should be quotations. Penalty for having more than 25% quotations or less than 15% could result in failure