HealthSouth Accounting Scandal Discussion

HealthSouth Accounting Scandal Discussion

HealthSouth Accounting Scandal Discussion

Post an initial 260- to 350-word response to the following questions
  • What events led to the HealthSouth accounting scandal?
  • What is your process for delivering unfavorable news of a project’s performance?
  • What controls currently exist to prevent abuses of power?
  • Are these challenges the result of the size, location, or function of the health care organization?

place-order

Please be sure you answer all questions (4)

You will need to read theses two articles found on the internet

  • SEC Charges HealthSouth Corp., CEO Richard Scrushy With $1.4 Billion Accounting Fraud and
  • Introduction to Corporate Governance

Cite at least 2 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references.

Format your citations according to APA guidelines.

HealthSouth Accounting Scandal Discussion

Assignment Details

For this Assignment, you are going to write a paper explaining how you developed your argument through the four stages (theorizing, syntax, theory testing, and evaluation). Your paper must be 3 to 5 pages, not including the title and reference pages.

To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.

Assignment Requirements

Before finalizing your work, you should:

  • Minimum requirement of at least 5 sources of support
  • be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
  • consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and
  • utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.

You may submit up to 2 extra credit commentaries on any of the assigned (non-textbook) readings throughout the semester.  Each commentary is worth 2 points of extra credit added to your overall point total for the semester.  To earn these points, you must submit a 3-5 page double-spaced response to a selected assigned research article on Canvas.  Your commentary should have a clearly stated argument which you then support with logic and additional academic sources.  As long as you critically engage with a reading in an organized, coherent manner that is generally free of grammatical and spelling errors, you will earn both possible points.  Some example prompts for a commentary include (but are not limited to):