NRS 437 Week 4 and 5 Discussion Papers

NRS 437 Week 4 and 5 Discussion Papers

NRS 437 Week 4 and 5 Discussion Papers

Week 4

Discussion 1

Does the principle of autonomy guarantee a person the right to do something that is harmful to oneself? To others? Explain your response with ethical rationale. NRS 437 Week 4 and 5 Discussion Papers.

Discussion 2

What is the difference between beneficence and nonmaleficence? Give examples of each from your clinical practice.

Week 5

Discussion 1

Max Points: 5.0

Read the case study below and answer questions 1-6.

Ethics Case Study: To Rescue Others at What Risk?

ACME Medical Center has been damaged seriously by a recent hurricane. A helicopter that is trying to rescue people stranded by the hurricane has crashed, hitting the wing of the building where the pediatric unit was located. In the midst of the explosion, fire, and confusion, five people make their way to the roof and wait for rescue. They are Mary, a mother carrying her ill infant who was a patient on the unit; Joseph, her husband and the baby’s father; John, a pediatric resident who had been caring for the baby; Margaret, the RN who was on duty in the pediatric unit; and Peter, a transport employee who was helping to prepare patients for rescue and evacuation. NRS 437 Week 4 and 5 Discussion Papers.

Mary says to the group, “I think I hear someone crying. Yes, I can hear cries for help. We’ve got to go back down the stairs and help those people!” Dr. John says, “You women stay here. Joseph and I will go back down and see what we can do.” Joseph looks first at his own ill infant and then down the smoke-filled stairs and replies, “I’m not going back down. It’s too risky. The smoke is too thick. We’d never make it through and survive.” Margaret, the RN, says, “We’ve got to do something. We can’t just let people die. I’d never be able to live with myself. Those are my patients and I need to help them.” Margaret runs down the stairs and disappears. Peter says, “You’re all crazy! In a situation like this it’s every man for himself!”

Questions:

1. What is the ethical dilemma?
2. What is yourvalue and ethical position related to the case? Include discussion of theory and principles on which your position is based.
3. What are some other alternatives for resolving the problem?
4. What are the possible consequences for those acceptable alternatives?
5. How would you prioritize the acceptable alternatives?
6. What is your plan of action?

Discussion 2

Health care providers are obligated to provide for those entrusted in their care. To what extent do they meet this obligation? How might their obligation to others conflict with their obligation to themselves?

NRS 437 Assignment 4,5Week 4 assignment

Details:

This is a CLC assignment.

The CLC group selection process will be outlined by the instructor.

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment. In your CLC group, select a scenario from those listed in the assignment resource.

As a group, write a formal paper of 750-1,000 words identifying important components of the topic. Include the following:

1. A description of the topic and related ethical implications: (a) obligations to your profession and work as a nurse, (b) laws regarding this topic, and (c) stakeholders in this scenario.
2. A summary of the impact on social values, morals, norms, and nursing practice.
3. An explanation of how an ethical theory and/or ethical principle might be applied to address the chosen topic.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

week 5 assignments

Details:

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment. Part Two is an individual assignment that will also be used in Part Three, the culiminating paper.

For this individual assignment, interview a hospital administrator, a spiritual leader, a health care colleague, or a neighbor/friend.

Individually, you only need to interview one person, but your CLC group must have representation from four different individuals and perspectives to complete Part Three of the Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment.

Students should discuss within their CLC group to determine who will be responsible for interviewing the hospital administrator, the spiritual leader, the health care colleague, and the neighbor/friend to make sure all roles are covered.

In your interview, ask about the individual’s philosophy and worldview in relation to the ethical dilemma your CLC group chose for Part One of the Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma group assignment. Craft a 250-500 word summary of the individual’s response, including the individual’s identified philsophy and worldview. NRS 437 Week 4 and 5 Discussion Papers.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS 437V.CLCAnalysisofanEthical Dilemma_11-24-14.docx

Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

This is a CLC assignment.

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.

After completing the individual interviews (Part Two), share your interview results. As a group, consider the responses of the four types of individuals interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.

Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words. Incorporate the research your group has done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma. Be sure to clearly articulate your group’s position and the rationale for your position.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. NRS 437 Week 4 and 5 Discussion Papers

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.